Littlewood v0.88 Download Update

Littlewood v0.88 Fitgirl Repack Free Download PC Game

Littlewood v0.88 Fitgirl Repack Free Download PC Game final version or you can say the latest update and Littlewood v0.89 download is released for PC.And the best this about this DLC is that it’s free to download.In this Tutorial we will show you how to download and Install Littlewood v0.88 Torrent for free.Before you download and install this awesome game on your computer note that this game is highly compressed and is the repack version of this game.

Download Littlewood v0.88 Fit girl repack is a free to play game.Yes you can get this game for free.Now there are different website from which you can download Littlewood v0.88 igg games and ocean of games are the two most popular websites.Also ova games and the skidrow reloaded also provide you to download this awesome game.

Littlewood v0.88 for Android and iOS?

Yes you can download Littlewood v0.88 on your Android and iOS platform and again they are also free to download.

Also Read:

How To download and Install Littlewood v0.88

Now to download and Install Littlewood v0.88 for free on your PC you have to follow below given steps.If there is a problem then you can comment down below in the comment section we will love to help you on this.

  1. First you have to download Littlewood v0.88 on your PC.You can find the download button at the top of the post.
  2. Now the download page will open.There you have to login .Once you login the download process will starts automatically.
  3. If you are unable to download this game then make sure you have deactivated your Ad blocker.Other wise you will not be able to download this game on to your PC.
  4. Now if you want to watch game Installation video and Trouble shooting tutorial then head over to the next section.

TROUBLESHOOTING Littlewood v0.88 Download

Screenshots  (Tap To Enlarge)

 Now if you are interested in the screen shots then tap down on the picture to enlarge them.

Littlewood v0.88 Review ,Walkthrough and Gameplay

I’m predicting only good things from this point forward I wonder how many of these people I can fit in my Littlewood v0.88 update download, except the old ones of course they’re gonna die soon anyway obviously our outfit is very very important but what does personality have to do with anything well that probably roughly describes me I think I heard coffee being brewed so far so good scoping out potential victims I look like Charlie Brown. I Littlewood v0.88 igg games picked a yellow shirt oh hello willow you’re here just to annoy me Littlewood v0.88 ocean of games.

If you’re awake no I’m asleep walking out my front door I was so worried about you you were asleep for three days are you standing outside my house at entire time all of the towns across solemn are finally beginning to rebuild all it the sacrifice of my hair you don’t remember anything come on don’t be silly well oh you’re testing my patience either marry me and get in the house or get out of my way.You the hero of solemn save the world by defeating the dark wizard that really doesn’t sound like something I would do you can’t remember huh nope nor do. I care can I go play with stuff first things first we’ve got to rebuild this town yeah we don’t have to do anything you have fun with that though it’s like they’re not even trying to hide these treasure chests 80 plain brick that’s a lot of plain brick normally gotta work towards these kind of things 80 wooden planks there was definitely another Chester to hiding somewhere on the upper edge of the map can I jump down that nope Charlie Brown’s not a jumper he fears the hills Littlewood v0.88 ocean of games,so I’ve gotta walk all the way around oh there is a red button never mind better be rewarding 10 dirt I walked all the way up here for 10 dirt and weeds okay the first challenging thing I’ve encountered a chest up there they’ll note apparently I can elevate this for one brain orb.

I would like to do that do I have any green orbs oh I see well now I’m just wasting things it can we lower the chest at least what did I do that you must open this outside a build mode well okay abracadabra I’m up here now give me the chest unto dewdrops and I’m stuck don’t know how I cut up here don’t know how to get down though I’m kind of thinking I can use build mode to teleport now if I go there and say come out of there yep that’s how I fast travel around the map I can cheat I’ve been at this for 30 seconds Littlewood v0.88 pc download and I’ve already figured out how to definitely break things I see earth that’s even worse than regular earth what’s your problem Dalton Dalton you’re a simple man whoa so the rumors are true innocent until proven guilty but thanks it’s really you yeah our Savior the Dark Wizard is alive after all Eddie’s descendants I never ever thought I’d hear you don’t recognize me yeah you’re that idiot that blinks too much we did so many quests together maybe well in any case this is cause for celebration.

Did you just give me your house is a celebration and we’re also in love now Dalton’s house. I don’t know what I’m supposed to do with dolphins house is this it number mill only dewdrops times a hundred and that gives me a 15 percent chance to craft a bonus penguin crafting how about no I’m assuming this would be the blacksmith and I definitely have some business here because I would actually like to make some tools that way I can actually do something okay again I get done in my dewdrops to get extra crafting stuff but I can’t even use the crafting thing yet because I don’t have any hair at least I assume that’s a problem, so far I have yet to confirm that okay so under the build tab we actually have things like Dalton’s house I guess this is celebration for me I saving the world I can bail Dalton his house for him.Now it’s just what I always wanted such a great reward for saving the world yep can we just go ahead and put that there what’s the button you don’t even have anything in your house what was the point of me building up for you I don’t know what this town’s name was oh but we give it a new name what do you think DF yeah maybe Littlewood v0.88 download .

I should pretty much just be in charge of everything because I’m the one building it anyway that’s sure to attract some new people this town will be called free candy is that Dalton over there in fact he never moves he got my letter no we’ll have more help with rebuilding free candy yeah I bet he’s gonna be real helpful only had to build his house for him here’s a blueprint for a house you should build it right away okay I can now go to my house I get his take Dalton’s he doesn’t seem particularly useful my house is roughly that big what is that four by three spaces well I was gonna build my house on top of a mountain now I guess I’m just going to build on whatever this is Littlewood v0.88 download.

But if I raise everything up this is all technically my yard right I don’t know what I’m doing anymore beautiful right there if I can’t have the coolest house in all the land what’s the point of having all this land or rebuilding his town complement why of course I love giving compliments you really think so I guess I am pretty handy no I said pretty handsome in a rugged charming kind of way come visit me first thing tomorrow at my house I have a really neat idea for this town. I’m here now if you have time we could just get this over with in case you didn’t know you can go to sleep earn it by interacting with your bed in case you didn’t know we don’t have to wait till tomorrow to hear your stupid idea yep and way to interact with my bed this house is perfect for a great hero like you.


The Co-insurance Clause

The Co-insurance Clause
The Co-insurance Clause

Of the more important clauses in current use, the one most frequently used, most severely criticized, most mis¬ understood, most legislated against, and withal the most reasonable and most equitable, is that which in general terms is known as the “co-insurance clause.”
Insurance is one of the great necessities of our business, social and economic life, and the expense of maintaining it should be distributed among the property owners of the country as equitably as it is humanly possible so to do.
Losses and expenses are paid out of premiums col¬ lected. When a loss is total the penalty for underinsurance falls where it properly belongs, on the insured who has elected to save premium and assume a portion of the risk himself, and the same penalty for underinsurance should by contract be made to apply in case of partial loss as applies automatically in case of total loss.
If all losses were total, liberality on the part of the insured in the payment of premium would bring its own reward, and parsimony would bring its own penalty; but the records of the leading companies show that of all the losses sustained, about 65%—numerically—are less than $100; about 30% are between $100 and total; and about 5% are total. The natural inclination, therefore, on the part of the public, particularly on the less hazardous risks, is to under¬ insure and take the chance of not having a total loss; and this will generally be done except under special conditions, or when reasonably full insurance must be carried to sustain credit or as collateral security for loans. There were several strik¬ ing illustrations of this in the San Francisco conflagration, where the amount of insurance carried on so-called fireproof buildings was less than 10% of their value, and the insured in such instances, of course, paid a heavy penalty for their neglect to carry adequate insurance.
Co-insurance operates only in case of partial loss, where both the insurance carried and the loss sustained are less than the prescribed percentage named in the clause, and has the effect of preventing one who has insured for a small percentage of value and paid a correspondingly small pre¬ mium from collecting as much in the event of loss as one who has insured for a large percentage of value and paid a correspondingly large premium. We have high authority for the principle,
“He which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly, and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully.”
and it should be applied to contracts of insurance. Rating systems may come, and rating systems may go; but, unless the principle of co-insurance be recognized and universally applied, there can be no equitable division of the insurance burden, and the existing inequalities will go on forever. The principle is so well established in some countries that the general foreign form of policy issued by the London offices for use therein contains the full co-insurance clause in the printed conditions.
The necessity for co-insurance as an equalizer of rates was quite forcibly illustrated by a prominent underwriter in an ad¬ dress delivered several years ago, in the following example involving two buildings of superior construction:
Value $100,000 Value $100,000
Insurance 80,000 Insurance 10,000
Rate 1% Rate 1%
Premium received— Premium received—
one year, 800 one year, 100
No Co-insurance Clause No Co-insurance Clause
Loss 800 Loss 800
Loss Collectible 800 Loss Collectible 800
“B” pays only one-eighth as much premium as “A,” yet both collect the same amount of loss, and in the absence of co-insurance conditions both would collect the same amount in all instances where the loss is $10,000 or less. Of course, if the loss should exceed $10,000, “A” would reap his reward, and “B” would pay his penalty. This situation clearly calls either for a difference in rate in favor of “A” or for a difference in loss collection as against “B,” and the latter can be regulated only through the medium of a co-insurance condition in the policy.
At this point it may not be amiss incidentally to inquire why the owner of a building which is heavily encumbered, whose policies are payable to a mortgagee (particularly a junior encumbrancer) under a mortgagee clause, and where subrogation may be of little or no value, should have the benefit of the same rate as the owner of another building of similar construction with similar occupancy, but unencum¬ bered.
In some states rates are made with and without co- insurance conditions, quite a material reduction in the basis rate being allowed for the insertion of the 80% clause in the policy, and a further reduction for the use of the 90% and 100% clauses. This, however, does not go far enough, and any variation in rate should be graded according to the co-insurance percentage named in the clause, and this gradation should not be restricted, as it is, to 80%, 90% or 100%, if the principle of equalization is to be maintained.
Various clauses designed to give practical effect to the co-insurance principle have been in use in this country for nearly forty years in connection with fire and other contracts of insurance. Some of these are well adapted to the purpose intended, while others fail to accomplish said purpose under certain conditions; but, fortunately, incidents of this nature are not of frequent occurrence.
There are, generally speaking, four forms, which differ quite materially in phraseology, and sometimes differ in prac¬ tical application. These four clauses are: (1) the old co- insurance clause; (2) the percentage co-insurance clause; (3) the average clause; (4) the reduced rate contribution clause.
Until recently, underwriters were complacently using some of these titles indiscriminately in certain portions of the country, under the assumption that the clauses, although differently phrased, were in effect the same, but they were subjected to quite a rude awakening by a decision which was handed down about a year ago by the Tennessee Court of Civic Appeals. The law in Tennessee permits the use of the three-fourths value clause and the co-insurance clause, but permits no other restrictive provisions. The form in use bore the inscription “Co-insurance Clause,” but the context was the phraseology of the reduced rate contribution clause, and although the result was the same under the operation of either, the court held that the form used was not the co- insurance clause, hence it was void and consequently inop¬ erative. Thompson vs. Concordia Fire Ins. Co. (Tenn. 1919) 215 S.W. Rep. 932, 55 Ins. Law Journal 122.
The law of Georgia provides that all insurance companies shall pay the full amount of loss sustained up to the amount of insurance expressed in the policy, and that all stipulations in such policies to the contrary shall be null and void. The law further provides that when the insured has several policies on the same property, his recovery from any company will be pro rata as to the amount thereof.
About twenty years ago, the Supreipe Court of Georgia was called upon to decide whether under the law referred to the old co-insurance clause then in use, which provided
“that the assured shall at all times maintain a total insurance upon the property insured by this policy of not less than 75% of the actual cash value thereof . . . . and that failing to do so, the assured shall
become a co-insurer to the extent of the deficiency,”
was valid and enforceable, and it decided that the clause was not violative of the law. Pekor vs. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. (1898) (106 Ga. page 1)

The Co-insurance Clause
The Co-insurance Clause
The court evidently construed the clause as a binding agreement on the part of the insured to secure insurance up to a certain percentage of value, and virtually held that if the insured himself desired to take the place of another insurance company he was at liberty to do so as one way of fulfilling his agreement.

The Georgia courts, however, have not passed upon the validity of the reduced rate contribution clause in connection with the statutory law above referred to; but it is fair to assume that they will view the matter in the same light as the Tennessee court (supra), and hold that it is not a co-insurance clause, even though it generally produces the same result; that it contains no provision whatever requiring the insured to carry or procure a stated amount of insurance, and in event of failure, to become a co-insurer, but that it is simply a clause placing a limitation upon the insurer’s liability, which is expressly prohibited by statute. The fact that the insurers have labeled it “75% Co-insurance Clause” does not make it such.
It is, therefore, not at all surprising that the question is frequently asked as to the difference between the various forms of so-called co-insurance clauses, and these will be considered in the order in which, chronologically, they came into use.
Probably in ninety-nine cases out of one hundred there is no difference* between these clauses in the results obtained by their application, but cases occasionally arise where ac¬ cording to the generally accepted interpretation the difference will be quite pronounced. This difference, which will be hereinafter considered, appears in connecton with the old co-insurance clause and the percentage co-insurance clause, and only in cases where the policies are nonconcurrent.
The first of the four forms is the old co-insurance clause which for many years was the only one used in the West, and which is used there still, to some extent, and now quite generally in the South. Its reintroduction in the South was probably due to the Tennessee decision, to which reference has been made (supra). This clause provides that the insured shall maintain insurance on the property described in the policy to the extent of at least a stated percentage (usually 80%) of the actual cash value thereof, and failing so to do, shall to the extent of such deficit bear his, her or their pro¬ portion of any loss. It does not say that he shall maintain insurance on all of the property, and the prevailing opinion is that the co-insurance clause will be complied with if he carries the stipulated percentage of insurance either on all or on any part of the property described, notwithstanding the fact that a portion of said insurance may be of no assist¬ ance whatever to the blanket, or more general policy, as a contributing factor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.