Dominance Fitgirl Repack

Dominance Download PC Game

Dominance Fitgirl Repack Free Download PC Game final version or you can say the latest update is released for PC. And the best this about this DLC is that it’s free to download. In this tutorial, we will show you how to download and Install Dominance Torrent for free. Before you download and install this awesome game on your computer note that this game is highly compressed and is the repack version of this game.

Download Dominance Fit girl repack is free to play the game. Yes you can get this game for free. Now there are different websites from which you can download Dominance igg games and the ocean of games are the two most popular websites. Also, ova games and the skidrow reloaded also provide you to download Dominance Fitgirl awesome game.

Dominance Fitgirl for Android and iOS?

Yes, you can download Dominance on your Android and iOS platform and again they are also free to download. Fitgirl-repack Ocean of Games.

Also Read:

How To download and Install Dominance

Now to download and Install Dominance for free on your PC you have to follow below-given steps. If there is a problem then you can comment down below in the comment section we will love to help you on this.

  1. First, you have to download Dominance on your PC. You can find the download button at the top of the post.
  2. Now the download page will open. There you have to login. Once you login the download process will start automatically.
  3. If you are unable to download this game then make sure you have deactivated your Adblocker. Otherwise, you will not be able to download Dominance Fitgirlgame on to your PC.
  4. Now if you want to watch the Dominance Fitgirl game Installation video and Troubleshooting tutorial then head over to the next section.

TROUBLESHOOTING Dominance Fitgirl Download

Screenshots  (Tap To Enlarge)

 Now if you are interested in the screenshots then tap down on the picture to enlarge them.

Here’s the thing: If you wanna use real hardware for playing DOS games, Sure, it’s a perfectly valid option, it’s just you kinda need like three different machines to cover the whole gamut. You need something for the Dominance, you need something for the early ’90s, and you need something for the mid to late ’90s. So, with Dominance, which is a DOS emulator, you can just… emulate all of those settings. You can set your machine speed, you can set the type of video support, you can set up different audio devices. And, you know what the best part is? Let’s say you wanna play a game with a joystick. If you’re using a real DOS machine, you’re limited to a four-button joystick.

But with Dominance game download, you have access to pretty much *any* kind of joystick. And the best part is that because you’re not limited to four buttons, you can just assign any button to any keyboard key, or heck put joystick support into a DOS game that doesn’t even have it. Dominance Well, here we’re starting to get into the DOSBox side of things, as you might imagine if you’ve ever seen his show. He’s always talking about all these different configurations that you can use for every single game that he covers, it’s like this is the type of thing you’ll want to do to tweak Dominance, especially when you get to things like joysticks because there are an awful lot of extra options for Dominance, which is nice, because… He’s right, you really do need at least three computers to get the best situation of these different eras for the ’80s, early ’90s, mid-’90s, and in my case, a 4th era, the late ‘Dominance ocean of games. and that’s why I have so many dozens of PC setups lying around. But, if you don’t wanna do that, DOSBox is great.

It’s customizable, expandable even. And there are extra builds other than just the base Dominance game download, one that I’m quite fond of is DOSBox-SVN. It allows for things like 3DFX support and all sorts of extra cool stuff like that, and, I mean, there are just plenty of them out there. Fitgirl-repack Ocean of Games.

I recommend diving into that world of the Dominance ocean of games. Speaking of which, let’s move on to the next person, which is PushingUpRoses. PUR: When I was young, I had a Tandy 1000 and a lot of great games for it. but when I upgraded to my Windows machine, I found I could no longer play them. Compatibility issues were way more prominent in the ‘Dominance ocean of games, and when I found DOSBox, I found a brand-new way to play my old games on my new machines. I would say it’s what got me back into gaming. For a while, I just had all these disks sitting around collecting dust because my new machines could not play them. It’s definitely the most accessible and affordable option, seeing as though it’s free, and for me, it’s the most efficient way to capture footage for my video work. I also really like Dominance fitgirl repack, which is compatible with a lot of games both for DOS and for Windows, and it has an easy-to-use interface.

Not everyone can afford or is tech-savvy enough to build an older DOS or Windows machine, so I’m so glad we have options like Dominance. That way, everyone has a chance to enjoy their childhood games, or even games they’ve always wanted to play and just didn’t have the means. In adulthood, I did pick up a few machines that I use for both DOS and Windows games, but in terms of what I use the most, it’s definitely emulation. LGR: Well, absolutely agreeing there too. Fitgirl-repack Ocean of Games.

I mean, more Dominance Fitgirl Repacks, because as fun as real hardware can be, as much as a treat it is, it kind of is a treat, you know? You really have to commit to it if you want to use it. And, that is a big reason why a lot of people end up just not even going for older hardware at all and just sticking to DOSBox and. As you can see, it works for people just *fine*! Do you know? You have that and you also have other more specialized programs for individual games, like ScummVM, for instance, runs a ton of LucasArts, Sierra, and all sorts of adventure games right there and they’re often much better results than what you’d get in DOSBox.

The Insurance Society of New York

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

The subject of insurance forms is such an exceedingly broad one, that it will be impossible in an address such as this to do more than touch upon it in a general way, and direct attention to some of the more important forms, which, although in general use, may possess features which are not fully understood.
The best form, whether viewed from the standpoint of the insurance company or the insured, is a fair form, one which expresses in clear, unambiguous language the mutual intention of the parties, and affords no cause for surprise on the part of either, after a loss has occurred. But the prepara¬ tion of such a form is not always an easy task, and it is right at this point that the ability of the broker and the underwriter come into play.
A distinguished Englishman declared that the English Constitution was the greatest production that had ever been conceived by the brain of man, but it was subjected to the most scathing criticism and violent assaults by Bentham, the great subversive critic of English law. Twenty-five years ago the New York Standard Policy was prepared by the best legal and lay talent in the insurance, world, and the greatest care was taken to present not only a reasonable and fair form of contract between the insurer and the insured, but one which could be easily read and understood.
While no such extravagant claims have been made for the Standard Policy as were made for the “Matchless Con-maximum of loss collection with a minimum of co-insurance or other resistance than a present day broker, he has not yet been discovered.
The ornate policies in use thirty years ago, with no uniformity in conditions, with their classification of hazards which no one could understand and their fine print which few could read, have given way to plainly printed uniform Standard Policies with materially simplified conditions. But the written portion of the insurance contract owing to our commercial and industrial growth, instead of becoming more simple, has taken exactly the opposite direction, and we now have covering under a single policy or set of policies, the entire property of a coal and mining company, the breweries, public service or traction lines of a whole city and the fixed property, rolling stock and common carrier liability of an entire railroad system involving millions of dollars and con¬ taining items numbering into the thousands. This forcibly illustrates the evolution of the policy form since the issue of the first fire insurance contract by an American company one hundred and sixty years ago, in favor of a gentleman bearing the familiar name of John Smith, covering
“500 £ on his dwelling house on the east side of King Street, between Mulberry and Sassafras, 30 feet front, 40 feet deep, brick, 9-inch party walls, three stories in height, plas¬ tered partitions, open newel bracket stairs, pent houses with board ceilings, garrets finished, three stories, painted brick kitchen, two stories in height, 15 feet 9 inches front, 19 feet 6 inches deep, dresser, shelves, wainscot closet fronts, shingling 1-5 worn.”
It will be observed that in the matter of verbiage this primitive form rivals some of our present day household furniture forms and all will agree that this particular dwelling might have been covered just as effectually and identified quite as easily without such an elaborate description.
Any one who has an insurable interest in property should be permitted to have any form of contract that he is willing to pay for, provided it is not contrary to law or against public policy, and judging from a contract of insurance issued by a certain office not long ago the insuring public apparently has no difficulty in securing any kind of a policy it may desire at any price it may be willing to pay. The contract in ques¬ tion was one for £20,000, covering stock against loss from any cause, except theft on the part of employes, anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, on land or water, without any con¬ ditions, restrictions or limitations whatsoever, written at less than one-half the Exchange rate in the insured’s place of business. An insurance agent upon being asked whether he thought it was good, said that if the company was anywhere near as good as the form, it was all that could be desired, but vouchsafed the opinion that it looked altogether too good to be good.

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

In these days we frequently find concentrated within the walls of a single structure one set of fire insurance policies covering on building, another on leasehold interest, another on rents or rental value—and in addition to this, policies for various tenants covering stock, fixtures, improvements, profits and use and occupancy, subject to the 100% average or co-insurance clause, to say nothing of steam boiler, casualty and liability insurance, thereby entirely eliminating the ele¬ ment of personal risk on the part of the owners, and produc¬ ing a situation which will account in some measure for the 17,000 annual fire alarms and $15,000,000 fire loss in New York City; $230,000,000 annual fire loss in the country at large, and for the constantly increasing percentage of cases where there are two or more fires in the same building and two or more claims from the same claimant.
The most common and perhaps least understood phrase found in policies of fire insurance is what is known as the “Commission Clause,” which reads “his own or held by him in trust or on commission or sold but not delivered” or “re¬ moved.” This clause in one form or another has been in use for many years, and it was originally the impression of un¬ derwriters that owing to the personal nature of the insurance contract a policy thus worded would simply cover the prop¬ erty of the insured and his interest in the property of others, such as advances and storage charges, but the courts have disabused their minds of any such narrow interpretation and have placed such a liberal construction upon the words “held in trust” that they may be justly regarded as among the broadest in the insurance language and scarcely less com¬ prehensive than the familiar term “for account of whom it may concern”; in fact, the principles controlling one phrase are similar to those governing the other.
It has been held that whether a merchant or bailee has assumed responsibility, or agreed to keep the property cov¬ ered or whether he is legally liable or not, if his policies contain the words “held in trust,” the owner may, after a fire, by merely ratifying the insurance of the bailee, appro¬ priate that for which he paid nothing whatever and may file proofs and bring suit in his own name against the bailee’s insurers. Nor is this all, for in some jurisdictions, if the bailee fails to include the loss on property of the bailor in his claim against his insurers, or if he does include it and the amount of insurance collectible is less than the total loss, the bailee may not first reimburse himself for the loss on his own goods and hold the balance in trust for the owners, but must prorate the amount actually collected with those own¬ ers who may have adopted the insurance, although, if he has a lien on any of the goods for charges or advances, this may be deducted from the proportion of insurance money due such owners The phrase “for account of whom it may concern” was formerly confined almost entirely to marine insurance, but in recent years there has been an increasing tendency to intro¬ duce it into policies of fire insurance.
All authorities are agreed that the interests protected by a policy containing these words must have been within the contemplation of him who took out the policy at the time it was issued. It is not necessary that he should have in¬ tended it for the benefit of some then known and particular individuals, but it would include such classes of persons as were intended to be included and who these were may be shown by parol. The owners or others intended to be cov¬ ered may ratify the insurance after a loss and take the bene¬ fit of it, though ignorant of its existence at the time of the issuance of the policy, just the same as under the term “held in trust.”
The words “for account of whom it may concern” are not limited in their protection to those persons who were concerned at the time the insurance was taken out, but will protect those having an insurable interest and who are con¬ cerned at the time when the loss occurs. They will cover the interest of a subsequent purchaser of a part or the whole of the property and supersede the alienation clause of the policy (U. S. S. C.), Hagan and Martin vs. Scottish Union and National Ins. Co., 32 Ins. Law Journal, p. 47; 186 U. S. 423).
A contract of insurance written in the name of “John Doe & Co. for account of whom it may concern” should contain a clause reading “Loss, if any, to be adjusted with and payable to John Doe & Co.,” not “loss, if any, payable to them” or “loss, if any, payable to the assured,” as forms sometimes read.
Policies are frequently written in the name of a bailee covering “On merchandise, his own and on the property of others for which he is responsible,” or “for which he may be liable”—and it has been held that’the effect of these words is to limit the liability of the insurer to the loss on the assured’s own goods and to his legal liability for loss on goods belonging to others, but the words “for which they are or may be liable” have been passed upon by the Supreme Court of Illinois, and they have been given an entirely dif¬ ferent interpretation. That tribunal in the case of The Home Insurance Company vs. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. (28 Insurance Law Journal, p. 289; 178 Ills. 64) decided that the words quoted were merely descriptive of the cars to be insured; that the word “liable” as used in the policy did not signify a perfected or fixed legal liability, but rather a con¬ dition out of which a legal liability might arise.
As illustrative of its position the court said that an assignor of a negotiable note may, with no incorrectness of speech, be said to be liable upon his assignment obligation is not an absolute fixed legal liability but is con¬ tingent upon the financial condition of the maker; and ac¬ cordingly held that the insurance company was liable for loss on all the cars in the possession of the railroad company, notwithstanding the fact that the latter was not legally liable to the owners.
In view of the exceedingly broad construction which the courts have placed upon the time honored and familiar phrases to which reference has been made, it is important for the party insured, whether it be a railroad or other transportation company, a warehouseman, a laundryman, a tailor, a com¬ mission merchant or other bailee, to determine before the fire whether he desires the insurance to be so broad in its cover as to embrace not only his own property and interest, but also the property of everybody else which may happen to be in his custody; if so, he should be careful to insure for a sufficiently large amount to meet all possible co-insurance conditions,, and if he wishes to make sure of being fully reimbursed for his own loss, his only safe course is to insure for the full value of all the property in his possession.
At this point the inquiry which naturally presents itself is, how should a policy be written if a merchant, warehouse¬ man or other bailee desires to protect his own interest but not the interest of any one else? The following form is suggested: “On merchandise his own, and on his interest in and on his legal liability for property held by him in trust or on commission or on joint account with others, or sold but not removed, or on storage or for repairs, while con¬ tained, etc.” This will, it is believed, limit the operation of co-insurance conditions and at the same time prevent the owners from adopting, appropriating or helping themselves to the bailee’s insurance, for which they pay nothing and to which they are not equitably entitled.
Many of the household furniture forms now in use, in addition to embracing almost every conceivable kind of per¬ sonal property except that specifically prohibited by the pol¬ icy conditions, are also made to cover similar property be¬ longing to any member of the family or household, visitors, guests and servants.
This form would seem to indicate considerable ingenu¬ ity on the part of the broker, broad liberality on the part of the insurance company and commendable generosity on the part of the insured, and the latter would probably feel more than compensated by being able to reimburse his guest for any fire damage he might sustain while enjoying his hospi¬ tality, but the amount of insurance carried under such a form should anticipate the possibility of his having a number of guests at one time and a corresponding increase in the value at risk.
It must be borne in mind that in localities where co- insurance conditions prevail the value of property belonging

WORLD OF HORROR Fitgirl Repack

WORLD OF HORROR Download PC Game

WORLD OF HORROR Fitgirl Repack Free Download PC Game final version or you can say the latest update is released for PC. And the best this about this DLC is that it’s free to download. In this tutorial, we will show you how to download and Install WORLD OF HORROR Torrent for free. Before you download and install this awesome game on your computer note that this game is highly compressed and is the repack version of this game.

Download WORLD OF HORROR Fit girl repack is free to play the game. Yes, you can get this game for free. Now there are different website from which you can download WORLD OF HORROR igg games and ocean of games are the two most popular websites. Also, ova games and the skidrow reloaded also provide you to download this awesome game.

WORLD OF HORROR for Android and iOS?

Yes, you can download WORLD OF HORROR on your Android and iOS platform and again they are also free to download.

Also Read:

How To download and Install WORLD OF HORROR Fitgirl

Now to download and Install WORLD OF HORROR for free on your PC you have to follow below-given steps. If there is a problem then you can comment down below in the comment section we will love to help you on this.

  1. First, you have to download the WORLD OF HORROR on your PC.You can find the download button at the top of the post.
  2. Now the download page will open.There you have to log in.Once you login the download process will start automatically.
  3. If you are unable to download this game then make sure you have deactivated your Adblocker. Otherwise, you will not be able to download this game on to your PC.
  4. Now if you want to watch the WORLD OF HORROR Fitgirl game Installation video and Troubleshooting tutorial then head over to the next section.

TROUBLESHOOTING WORLD OF HORROR Fitgirl Download

Screenshots  (Tap To Enlarge)

 Now if you are interested in the screenshots then tap down on the picture to enlarge them.

This thing is a WORLD OF HORROR game download. As the name suggests, under the hood is an Intel DX4, a clock tripled 486, and really, the WORLD OF HORROR ocean of games of Intel 486 processors. I’ve slotted a Sound Blaster 16 and CD-ROM drive in mine, as well as upgrading to a whopping 32 megabytes of RAM and two-gigabyte hard drive to create a machine that would have blown the minds and swollen tear ducts in 1994. This machine is from the era of gaming I love the most. I could always use a Pentium, but there’s something about pushing the 486 to its limits that I find pleasing.

WORLD OF HORROR runs smooth as silk, and while it might struggle with some later games, I actually quite like that. It also has a snazzy BIOS menu, and I find the pairing of MS-DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.11 to be the peak of civilization. Not to mention it’s very aesthetically pleasing to look at, even with a 17 inch CRT plonked on top. All of these things combined make this my go-to machine for DOS gaming. WORLD OF HORROR: Well, as you might imagine, this is very much a viewpoint that I can get behind. Sometimes a good, decent 486 is really all you need. It’s not the fastest, but it doesn’t need to be. A lot of times, those limitations can be fun and admittedly, tweaking and getting games to work that maybe shouldn’t on a slightly slower computer is a lot of the appeal of running games on older hardware, at least for me. And really, a 100 megahertz WORLD OF HORROR PC download machine is *plenty*, um, in fact, I’m also very fond of these Compaq Presario. Presario or- S- s- studios or whatever- they’re very cool machines, I love my model 425 right here. It’s an all in one box, it’s kind of a great middle-ground of having a full-size desktop, but also smaller space it’s taking up and it has a CRT and it’s very capable with the components inside. But anyway, uh, let’s move on to another point of view, and that is from Metal Jesus Rocks.

WORLD OF HORROR game download Hey guys, Metal Jesus here. Now, in my retro gaming PC, I was looking for something that perfectly encapsulated say, 1998 and 1999, something that would run, say, Battle Bugs and also Septerra Core, and all the rest of these games that I have behind me here. Something that would run DOS and also Windows 98. So what I ended up doing was starting with this Dell. This is a WORLD OF HORROR. It has an Intel Pentium II processor in there.

Then we maxed out the motherboard with 384 megabytes of RAM, I believe. But as you guys know, it’s the video card and the sound card that determines how well all these games play. So, for this machine, we put a WORLD OF HORROR PC download Voodoo 3 in there, 3000 is the model number, which works flawlessly both in DOS and in Windows. For the sound card, I decided to not go with something exotic because again, I’m looking for maximum compatibility both in DOS and Windows with every game I possibly can. So I went with the standard. I went with the Creative Labs Sound Blaster 16, and it works great. The final must piece for my machine is the floppy drive because so many of the games that I own are on either 3½ or 5¼ floppy.

The problem is is that my motherboard will only take one at a time, so, right now I have a 3½ in there, but I do have a 5¼ that I can swap out if needed. I’m very happy with it. WORLD OF HORROR ocean of games Alright, some very good points are brought up here because sometimes you wanna push it a little bit further than say a 486, and go with something that can also do Windows 98, but when you get into that era, or really, any era, sometimes you’re gonna just have to compromise.

Like, in his case, where he was only able to run one type of floppy disk at the same time. Sometimes, that can be due to the controller or the BIOS being used on the computer, other times, you just don’t have things working how it should, and it’s weird. I dunno, I’ve had that happen on several of my computers in that sort of late ’90s, early WORLD OF HORROR era. And then, the other thing to mention there is that uh, while there are external 3½ inch drives for you know, older computers and more modern ones as well over USB, 5¼ inch, you’re kind of stuck with an internal one. There are some adapters that let you use 5¼ inch drives on USB, but it’s only a read-only thing for the most part. WORLD OF HORROR Fitgirl Free Download.

Eh, writing is odd if you wanted to get it working externally, so something to keep in mind. Well anyway, the next person on the list is going to be Ancient DOS Games. ADG: So when it comes to DOS gaming, you might think I’d be the kind of person who prefers to use real hardware. But quite frankly, I just like emulating it on my Windows 10 machine.

 

The Insurance Society of New York

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

The subject of insurance forms is such an exceedingly broad one, that it will be impossible in an address such as this to do more than touch upon it in a general way, and direct attention to some of the more important forms, which, although in general use, may possess features which are not fully understood.
The best form, whether viewed from the standpoint of the insurance company or the insured, is a fair form, one which expresses in clear, unambiguous language the mutual intention of the parties, and affords no cause for surprise on the part of either, after a loss has occurred. But the prepara¬ tion of such a form is not always an easy task, and it is right at this point that the ability of the broker and the underwriter come into play.
A distinguished Englishman declared that the English Constitution was the greatest production that had ever been conceived by the brain of man, but it was subjected to the most scathing criticism and violent assaults by Bentham, the great subversive critic of English law. Twenty-five years ago the New York Standard Policy was prepared by the best legal and lay talent in the insurance, world, and the greatest care was taken to present not only a reasonable and fair form of contract between the insurer and the insured, but one which could be easily read and understood.
While no such extravagant claims have been made for the Standard Policy as were made for the “Matchless Con-maximum of loss collection with a minimum of co-insurance or other resistance than a present day broker, he has not yet been discovered.
The ornate policies in use thirty years ago, with no uniformity in conditions, with their classification of hazards which no one could understand and their fine print which few could read, have given way to plainly printed uniform Standard Policies with materially simplified conditions. But the written portion of the insurance contract owing to our commercial and industrial growth, instead of becoming more simple, has taken exactly the opposite direction, and we now have covering under a single policy or set of policies, the entire property of a coal and mining company, the breweries, public service or traction lines of a whole city and the fixed property, rolling stock and common carrier liability of an entire railroad system involving millions of dollars and con¬ taining items numbering into the thousands. This forcibly illustrates the evolution of the policy form since the issue of the first fire insurance contract by an American company one hundred and sixty years ago, in favor of a gentleman bearing the familiar name of John Smith, covering
“500 £ on his dwelling house on the east side of King Street, between Mulberry and Sassafras, 30 feet front, 40 feet deep, brick, 9-inch party walls, three stories in height, plas¬ tered partitions, open newel bracket stairs, pent houses with board ceilings, garrets finished, three stories, painted brick kitchen, two stories in height, 15 feet 9 inches front, 19 feet 6 inches deep, dresser, shelves, wainscot closet fronts, shingling 1-5 worn.”
It will be observed that in the matter of verbiage this primitive form rivals some of our present day household furniture forms and all will agree that this particular dwelling might have been covered just as effectually and identified quite as easily without such an elaborate description.
Any one who has an insurable interest in property should be permitted to have any form of contract that he is willing to pay for, provided it is not contrary to law or against public policy, and judging from a contract of insurance issued by a certain office not long ago the insuring public apparently has no difficulty in securing any kind of a policy it may desire at any price it may be willing to pay. The contract in ques¬ tion was one for £20,000, covering stock against loss from any cause, except theft on the part of employes, anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, on land or water, without any con¬ ditions, restrictions or limitations whatsoever, written at less than one-half the Exchange rate in the insured’s place of business. An insurance agent upon being asked whether he thought it was good, said that if the company was anywhere near as good as the form, it was all that could be desired, but vouchsafed the opinion that it looked altogether too good to be good.

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

In these days we frequently find concentrated within the walls of a single structure one set of fire insurance policies covering on building, another on leasehold interest, another on rents or rental value—and in addition to this, policies for various tenants covering stock, fixtures, improvements, profits and use and occupancy, subject to the 100% average or co-insurance clause, to say nothing of steam boiler, casualty and liability insurance, thereby entirely eliminating the ele¬ ment of personal risk on the part of the owners, and produc¬ ing a situation which will account in some measure for the 17,000 annual fire alarms and $15,000,000 fire loss in New York City; $230,000,000 annual fire loss in the country at large, and for the constantly increasing percentage of cases where there are two or more fires in the same building and two or more claims from the same claimant.
The most common and perhaps least understood phrase found in policies of fire insurance is what is known as the “Commission Clause,” which reads “his own or held by him in trust or on commission or sold but not delivered” or “re¬ moved.” This clause in one form or another has been in use for many years, and it was originally the impression of un¬ derwriters that owing to the personal nature of the insurance contract a policy thus worded would simply cover the prop¬ erty of the insured and his interest in the property of others, such as advances and storage charges, but the courts have disabused their minds of any such narrow interpretation and have placed such a liberal construction upon the words “held in trust” that they may be justly regarded as among the broadest in the insurance language and scarcely less com¬ prehensive than the familiar term “for account of whom it may concern”; in fact, the principles controlling one phrase are similar to those governing the other.
It has been held that whether a merchant or bailee has assumed responsibility, or agreed to keep the property cov¬ ered or whether he is legally liable or not, if his policies contain the words “held in trust,” the owner may, after a fire, by merely ratifying the insurance of the bailee, appro¬ priate that for which he paid nothing whatever and may file proofs and bring suit in his own name against the bailee’s insurers. Nor is this all, for in some jurisdictions, if the bailee fails to include the loss on property of the bailor in his claim against his insurers, or if he does include it and the amount of insurance collectible is less than the total loss, the bailee may not first reimburse himself for the loss on his own goods and hold the balance in trust for the owners, but must prorate the amount actually collected with those own¬ ers who may have adopted the insurance, although, if he has a lien on any of the goods for charges or advances, this may be deducted from the proportion of insurance money due such owners The phrase “for account of whom it may concern” was formerly confined almost entirely to marine insurance, but in recent years there has been an increasing tendency to intro¬ duce it into policies of fire insurance.
All authorities are agreed that the interests protected by a policy containing these words must have been within the contemplation of him who took out the policy at the time it was issued. It is not necessary that he should have in¬ tended it for the benefit of some then known and particular individuals, but it would include such classes of persons as were intended to be included and who these were may be shown by parol. The owners or others intended to be cov¬ ered may ratify the insurance after a loss and take the bene¬ fit of it, though ignorant of its existence at the time of the issuance of the policy, just the same as under the term “held in trust.”
The words “for account of whom it may concern” are not limited in their protection to those persons who were concerned at the time the insurance was taken out, but will protect those having an insurable interest and who are con¬ cerned at the time when the loss occurs. They will cover the interest of a subsequent purchaser of a part or the whole of the property and supersede the alienation clause of the policy (U. S. S. C.), Hagan and Martin vs. Scottish Union and National Ins. Co., 32 Ins. Law Journal, p. 47; 186 U. S. 423).
A contract of insurance written in the name of “John Doe & Co. for account of whom it may concern” should contain a clause reading “Loss, if any, to be adjusted with and payable to John Doe & Co.,” not “loss, if any, payable to them” or “loss, if any, payable to the assured,” as forms sometimes read.
Policies are frequently written in the name of a bailee covering “On merchandise, his own and on the property of others for which he is responsible,” or “for which he may be liable”—and it has been held that’the effect of these words is to limit the liability of the insurer to the loss on the assured’s own goods and to his legal liability for loss on goods belonging to others, but the words “for which they are or may be liable” have been passed upon by the Supreme Court of Illinois, and they have been given an entirely dif¬ ferent interpretation. That tribunal in the case of The Home Insurance Company vs. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. (28 Insurance Law Journal, p. 289; 178 Ills. 64) decided that the words quoted were merely descriptive of the cars to be insured; that the word “liable” as used in the policy did not signify a perfected or fixed legal liability, but rather a con¬ dition out of which a legal liability might arise.
As illustrative of its position the court said that an assignor of a negotiable note may, with no incorrectness of speech, be said to be liable upon his assignment obligation is not an absolute fixed legal liability but is con¬ tingent upon the financial condition of the maker; and ac¬ cordingly held that the insurance company was liable for loss on all the cars in the possession of the railroad company, notwithstanding the fact that the latter was not legally liable to the owners.
In view of the exceedingly broad construction which the courts have placed upon the time honored and familiar phrases to which reference has been made, it is important for the party insured, whether it be a railroad or other transportation company, a warehouseman, a laundryman, a tailor, a com¬ mission merchant or other bailee, to determine before the fire whether he desires the insurance to be so broad in its cover as to embrace not only his own property and interest, but also the property of everybody else which may happen to be in his custody; if so, he should be careful to insure for a sufficiently large amount to meet all possible co-insurance conditions,, and if he wishes to make sure of being fully reimbursed for his own loss, his only safe course is to insure for the full value of all the property in his possession.
At this point the inquiry which naturally presents itself is, how should a policy be written if a merchant, warehouse¬ man or other bailee desires to protect his own interest but not the interest of any one else? The following form is suggested: “On merchandise his own, and on his interest in and on his legal liability for property held by him in trust or on commission or on joint account with others, or sold but not removed, or on storage or for repairs, while con¬ tained, etc.” This will, it is believed, limit the operation of co-insurance conditions and at the same time prevent the owners from adopting, appropriating or helping themselves to the bailee’s insurance, for which they pay nothing and to which they are not equitably entitled.
Many of the household furniture forms now in use, in addition to embracing almost every conceivable kind of per¬ sonal property except that specifically prohibited by the pol¬ icy conditions, are also made to cover similar property be¬ longing to any member of the family or household, visitors, guests and servants.
This form would seem to indicate considerable ingenu¬ ity on the part of the broker, broad liberality on the part of the insurance company and commendable generosity on the part of the insured, and the latter would probably feel more than compensated by being able to reimburse his guest for any fire damage he might sustain while enjoying his hospi¬ tality, but the amount of insurance carried under such a form should anticipate the possibility of his having a number of guests at one time and a corresponding increase in the value at risk.
It must be borne in mind that in localities where co- insurance conditions prevail the value of property belonging

MADNESS Project Nexus Fitgirl Repack

MADNESS Project Nexus Download PC Game

MADNESS Project Nexus Fitgirl Repack Free Download PC Game final version or you can say the latest update is released for PC. And the best this about this DLC is that it’s free to download. In this tutorial, we will show you how to download and Install MADNESS Project Nexus Torrent for free. Before you download and install this awesome game on your computer note that this game is highly compressed and is the repack version of this game.

Download MADNESS Project Nexus Fit girl repack is free to play the game. Yes you can get this game for free. Now there are different website from which you can download MADNESS Project Nexus igg games and ocean of games are the two most popular websites. Also, ova games and the skidrow reloaded also provide you to download this awesome game.

MADNESS Project Nexus for Android and iOS?

Yes, you can download MADNESS Project Nexus on your Android and iOS platform and again they are also free to download.

Also Read:

How To download and Install Madness Project Nexus

Now to download and Install MADNESS Project Nexus for free on your PC you have to follow below-given steps. If there is a problem then you can comment down below in the comment section we will love to help you on this.

  1. First, you have to download MADNESS Project Nexus on your PC. You can find the download button at the top of the post.
  2. Now the download page will open and start MADNESS Project Nexus Fitgirl downloading. There you have to log in. Once you login the download process will start automatically.
  3. If you are unable to download this game then make sure you have deactivated your Adblocker. Otherwise, you will not be able to download the MADNESS Project Nexus Fitgirl game on to your PC.
  4. Now if you want to watch the MADNESS Project Nexus Fitgirl game Installation video and Troubleshooting tutorial then head over to the next section.

TROUBLESHOOTING MADNESS Project Nexus Download

Screenshots  (Tap To Enlarge)

 Now if you are interested in the screenshots then tap down on the picture to enlarge them.

MADNESS Project Nexus Gameplay and Review

This paired with a turbo button is extremely useful, because a lot of games in the early MADNESS Project Nexus game download looking for a slower CPU, and the turbo button, you enable that, and it’s going to slow down your computer. What it does exactly is gonna vary depending on the computer you have, but generally, it slows things down. I’ve done an entire video about this in the past, so if you’re curious, you can check that out. As for the operating system, this thing runs MS-DOS 6.22, but I also have another MADNESS Project Nexus download card that I swap out with Windows 3.11 on there. But the thing is though, it doesn’t stop there! This computer is great for a lot of things, but there are games earlier and later and even around the same time that is way pickier and… this is just not going to work with it, or at least it won’t be ideal. I keep several early IBM PC compatibles hooked up for older games, like original IBM PCs with a 4.77 megahertz 8088 and some with an 8 megahertz, 286 CPU. These can be very valuable for early ’80s games, throughout around 1987 or so, and as far as sound, *Chuckles* there’s not much.

These just come with a PC speaker, or in the case of my IBM AT, and MADNESS Project Nexus igg games. Yes, just the original AdLib, which gives you that twangy FM synthesis sound. And it’s also worth noting that if you get many, many later cards that are compatible with the Sound Blaster standard, they’re gonna give you that AdLib FM synth sound, either in MADNESS Project Nexus ocean of games or something emulating it.

A slight step up from these is the 386 machines that I keep around, such as these computers that are around 16 to 25 megahertz, a 386 SX or DX. These are amazing for games that run too fast on even a mid-range 486, but are too slow on a 286 or 8088. Perfect for earlier VGA games and later EGA games, and I usually pair these kinds of things with a Sound Blaster 2.0 or equivalent. I also keep several machines set up with Windows 3.1 and 95 on there all the time. And these have anything from a 100 megahertz 486DX4 CPU, all the way up to a 233 megahertz Pentium MMX. Usually with SVGA, a Sound Blaster 16, or one of those clones from the time period. And finally for later ’90s Windows gaming, I largely stick to Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows XP machines. something with around an 800 megahertz Pentium III, on up to a 2.4 gigahertz Pentium 4, depending on what I need. Voodoo graphics are what I stick to for these for the most part, since the supplied 3DFX Glide mode, which is an incredibly popular thing, is different than Direct3D and OpenGL, so that’s worth keeping in mind. And some of the later ones I’ll stick a MADNESS Project Nexus torrent or an 8800 Ultra in there. And as far as displays, uh, I typically recommend going with a CRT if at all possible. It takes up a lot of space, but the result is fantastic in terms of reproduction of what the games are originally supposed to look like. And while I do still use certain older MADNESS Project Nexus fitgirl repack every so often, it’s only if they’re the right aspect ratio and don’t do weird things with the scaling because sometimes you can end up with stuff that looks blurred or the pixels aren’t the correct size. You don’t always have square pixels in these older games.

And typically, as far as sound cards go, you do want something a little better than Sound Blaster 16 for Windows 98 Second Edition or Windows XP. Something like the Aureal Vortex 2, which provides MADNESS Project Nexus PC download, a fantastic early 3D standard. I use that in a couple of my machines. And yes, Windows 98 is still built on top of MS-DOS, so things run quite well in DOS mode for the most part, but you do wanna watch out for compatibility issues in terms of graphics, sound, and CPU speed. And I’m not really gonna talk about Windows XP, since it doesn’t really have a proper DOS mode, and that’s getting into DOSBox territory, and you can start moving onto emulation and virtual machines anyway. With all that being said, though, there are so many other points of view on these kinds of topics.

So, without further ado, let’s get to our guests in no particular order, and we’re gonna start with Nostalgia MADNESS Project Nexus game download, my name is Nostalgia Nerd, and when it comes to DOS gaming, *this* is all I need.

The Insurance Society of New York

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

The subject of insurance forms is such an exceedingly broad one, that it will be impossible in an address such as this to do more than touch upon it in a general way, and direct attention to some of the more important forms, which, although in general use, may possess features which are not fully understood.
The best form, whether viewed from the standpoint of the insurance company or the insured, is a fair form, one which expresses in clear, unambiguous language the mutual intention of the parties, and affords no cause for surprise on the part of either, after a loss has occurred. But the prepara¬ tion of such a form is not always an easy task, and it is right at this point that the ability of the broker and the underwriter come into play.
A distinguished Englishman declared that the English Constitution was the greatest production that had ever been conceived by the brain of man, but it was subjected to the most scathing criticism and violent assaults by Bentham, the great subversive critic of English law. Twenty-five years ago the New York Standard Policy was prepared by the best legal and lay talent in the insurance, world, and the greatest care was taken to present not only a reasonable and fair form of contract between the insurer and the insured, but one which could be easily read and understood.
While no such extravagant claims have been made for the Standard Policy as were made for the “Matchless Con-maximum of loss collection with a minimum of co-insurance or other resistance than a present day broker, he has not yet been discovered.
The ornate policies in use thirty years ago, with no uniformity in conditions, with their classification of hazards which no one could understand and their fine print which few could read, have given way to plainly printed uniform Standard Policies with materially simplified conditions. But the written portion of the insurance contract owing to our commercial and industrial growth, instead of becoming more simple, has taken exactly the opposite direction, and we now have covering under a single policy or set of policies, the entire property of a coal and mining company, the breweries, public service or traction lines of a whole city and the fixed property, rolling stock and common carrier liability of an entire railroad system involving millions of dollars and con¬ taining items numbering into the thousands. This forcibly illustrates the evolution of the policy form since the issue of the first fire insurance contract by an American company one hundred and sixty years ago, in favor of a gentleman bearing the familiar name of John Smith, covering
“500 £ on his dwelling house on the east side of King Street, between Mulberry and Sassafras, 30 feet front, 40 feet deep, brick, 9-inch party walls, three stories in height, plas¬ tered partitions, open newel bracket stairs, pent houses with board ceilings, garrets finished, three stories, painted brick kitchen, two stories in height, 15 feet 9 inches front, 19 feet 6 inches deep, dresser, shelves, wainscot closet fronts, shingling 1-5 worn.”
It will be observed that in the matter of verbiage this primitive form rivals some of our present day household furniture forms and all will agree that this particular dwelling might have been covered just as effectually and identified quite as easily without such an elaborate description.
Any one who has an insurable interest in property should be permitted to have any form of contract that he is willing to pay for, provided it is not contrary to law or against public policy, and judging from a contract of insurance issued by a certain office not long ago the insuring public apparently has no difficulty in securing any kind of a policy it may desire at any price it may be willing to pay. The contract in ques¬ tion was one for £20,000, covering stock against loss from any cause, except theft on the part of employes, anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, on land or water, without any con¬ ditions, restrictions or limitations whatsoever, written at less than one-half the Exchange rate in the insured’s place of business. An insurance agent upon being asked whether he thought it was good, said that if the company was anywhere near as good as the form, it was all that could be desired, but vouchsafed the opinion that it looked altogether too good to be good.

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

In these days we frequently find concentrated within the walls of a single structure one set of fire insurance policies covering on building, another on leasehold interest, another on rents or rental value—and in addition to this, policies for various tenants covering stock, fixtures, improvements, profits and use and occupancy, subject to the 100% average or co-insurance clause, to say nothing of steam boiler, casualty and liability insurance, thereby entirely eliminating the ele¬ ment of personal risk on the part of the owners, and produc¬ ing a situation which will account in some measure for the 17,000 annual fire alarms and $15,000,000 fire loss in New York City; $230,000,000 annual fire loss in the country at large, and for the constantly increasing percentage of cases where there are two or more fires in the same building and two or more claims from the same claimant.
The most common and perhaps least understood phrase found in policies of fire insurance is what is known as the “Commission Clause,” which reads “his own or held by him in trust or on commission or sold but not delivered” or “re¬ moved.” This clause in one form or another has been in use for many years, and it was originally the impression of un¬ derwriters that owing to the personal nature of the insurance contract a policy thus worded would simply cover the prop¬ erty of the insured and his interest in the property of others, such as advances and storage charges, but the courts have disabused their minds of any such narrow interpretation and have placed such a liberal construction upon the words “held in trust” that they may be justly regarded as among the broadest in the insurance language and scarcely less com¬ prehensive than the familiar term “for account of whom it may concern”; in fact, the principles controlling one phrase are similar to those governing the other.
It has been held that whether a merchant or bailee has assumed responsibility, or agreed to keep the property cov¬ ered or whether he is legally liable or not, if his policies contain the words “held in trust,” the owner may, after a fire, by merely ratifying the insurance of the bailee, appro¬ priate that for which he paid nothing whatever and may file proofs and bring suit in his own name against the bailee’s insurers. Nor is this all, for in some jurisdictions, if the bailee fails to include the loss on property of the bailor in his claim against his insurers, or if he does include it and the amount of insurance collectible is less than the total loss, the bailee may not first reimburse himself for the loss on his own goods and hold the balance in trust for the owners, but must prorate the amount actually collected with those own¬ ers who may have adopted the insurance, although, if he has a lien on any of the goods for charges or advances, this may be deducted from the proportion of insurance money due such owners The phrase “for account of whom it may concern” was formerly confined almost entirely to marine insurance, but in recent years there has been an increasing tendency to intro¬ duce it into policies of fire insurance.
All authorities are agreed that the interests protected by a policy containing these words must have been within the contemplation of him who took out the policy at the time it was issued. It is not necessary that he should have in¬ tended it for the benefit of some then known and particular individuals, but it would include such classes of persons as were intended to be included and who these were may be shown by parol. The owners or others intended to be cov¬ ered may ratify the insurance after a loss and take the bene¬ fit of it, though ignorant of its existence at the time of the issuance of the policy, just the same as under the term “held in trust.”
The words “for account of whom it may concern” are not limited in their protection to those persons who were concerned at the time the insurance was taken out, but will protect those having an insurable interest and who are con¬ cerned at the time when the loss occurs. They will cover the interest of a subsequent purchaser of a part or the whole of the property and supersede the alienation clause of the policy (U. S. S. C.), Hagan and Martin vs. Scottish Union and National Ins. Co., 32 Ins. Law Journal, p. 47; 186 U. S. 423).
A contract of insurance written in the name of “John Doe & Co. for account of whom it may concern” should contain a clause reading “Loss, if any, to be adjusted with and payable to John Doe & Co.,” not “loss, if any, payable to them” or “loss, if any, payable to the assured,” as forms sometimes read.
Policies are frequently written in the name of a bailee covering “On merchandise, his own and on the property of others for which he is responsible,” or “for which he may be liable”—and it has been held that’the effect of these words is to limit the liability of the insurer to the loss on the assured’s own goods and to his legal liability for loss on goods belonging to others, but the words “for which they are or may be liable” have been passed upon by the Supreme Court of Illinois, and they have been given an entirely dif¬ ferent interpretation. That tribunal in the case of The Home Insurance Company vs. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. (28 Insurance Law Journal, p. 289; 178 Ills. 64) decided that the words quoted were merely descriptive of the cars to be insured; that the word “liable” as used in the policy did not signify a perfected or fixed legal liability, but rather a con¬ dition out of which a legal liability might arise.
As illustrative of its position the court said that an assignor of a negotiable note may, with no incorrectness of speech, be said to be liable upon his assignment obligation is not an absolute fixed legal liability but is con¬ tingent upon the financial condition of the maker; and ac¬ cordingly held that the insurance company was liable for loss on all the cars in the possession of the railroad company, notwithstanding the fact that the latter was not legally liable to the owners.
In view of the exceedingly broad construction which the courts have placed upon the time honored and familiar phrases to which reference has been made, it is important for the party insured, whether it be a railroad or other transportation company, a warehouseman, a laundryman, a tailor, a com¬ mission merchant or other bailee, to determine before the fire whether he desires the insurance to be so broad in its cover as to embrace not only his own property and interest, but also the property of everybody else which may happen to be in his custody; if so, he should be careful to insure for a sufficiently large amount to meet all possible co-insurance conditions,, and if he wishes to make sure of being fully reimbursed for his own loss, his only safe course is to insure for the full value of all the property in his possession.
At this point the inquiry which naturally presents itself is, how should a policy be written if a merchant, warehouse¬ man or other bailee desires to protect his own interest but not the interest of any one else? The following form is suggested: “On merchandise his own, and on his interest in and on his legal liability for property held by him in trust or on commission or on joint account with others, or sold but not removed, or on storage or for repairs, while con¬ tained, etc.” This will, it is believed, limit the operation of co-insurance conditions and at the same time prevent the owners from adopting, appropriating or helping themselves to the bailee’s insurance, for which they pay nothing and to which they are not equitably entitled.
Many of the household furniture forms now in use, in addition to embracing almost every conceivable kind of per¬ sonal property except that specifically prohibited by the pol¬ icy conditions, are also made to cover similar property be¬ longing to any member of the family or household, visitors, guests and servants.
This form would seem to indicate considerable ingenu¬ ity on the part of the broker, broad liberality on the part of the insurance company and commendable generosity on the part of the insured, and the latter would probably feel more than compensated by being able to reimburse his guest for any fire damage he might sustain while enjoying his hospi¬ tality, but the amount of insurance carried under such a form should anticipate the possibility of his having a number of guests at one time and a corresponding increase in the value at risk.
It must be borne in mind that in localities where co- insurance conditions prevail the value of property belonging

Being a DIK Season 1 Download PC Game

Being a DIK Season 1 Download PC Game

Being a DIK Season 1 Fitgirl Repack Free Download PC Game final version or you can say the latest update is released for PC. And the best this about this DLC is that it’s free to download. In this tutorial, we will show you how to download and Install Being a DIK Season 1 Torrent for free. Before you download and install this awesome game on your computer note that this game is highly compressed and is the repack version of this game.

Download Being a DIK Season 1 Fit girl repack is a free to play the game. Yes, you can get this game for free. Now there are different websites from which you can download Being a DIK Season 1 igg games an ocean of games are the two most popular websites. Also, ova games and the skidrow reloaded also provide you to download this awesome game.

Being a DIK Season 1 for Android and iOS?

Yes, you can download Being a DIK Season 1 on your Android and iOS platform and again they are also free to download.

Also Read:

How To download and Install Being a DIK Season 1

Now to download and Install Being a DIK Season 1 for free on your PC you have to follow below-given steps. If there is a problem then you can comment down below in the comment section we will love to help you on this.

  1. First, you have to download Being a DIK Season 1 on your PC. You can find the download button at the top of the post.
  2. Now the download page will open. There you have to log in. Once you login the download process will start automatically.
  3. If you are unable to download this game then make sure you have deactivated your Adblocker. Otherwise, you will not be able to Be a DIK Season 1 download game on to your PC.
  4. Now if you want to watch the Being a DIK Season 1 download game Installation video and Troubleshooting tutorial then head over to the next section.

TROUBLESHOOTING Being a DIK Season 1 Download

Screenshots  (Tap To Enlarge)

 Now if you are interested in the screenshots then tap down on the picture to enlarge them.

 

Being a DIK Season 1 Gameplay and Review

You can get a red LED here for a dollar twenty-nine-a tri-state LED Breadboards test clips cable kits toggle switches man. Just a toggle switch Wood Green Aluminum cabinet. I need that I don’t even know what I would use it for I just need it This is Being a DIK Season 1 fitgirl repack interface project board miniature TV transmitter except black and white or color video signal perfect for use with microcomputers and TV typewriters and this these are some things that it can be kind of hard to get information on as far as pricing.

Like really nailed down specifics from a very specific time period one reason I love these Being a DIK Season 1 ocean of games oh Oh, yeah, here we go 1979 the TRS-80 level – 16 K Don’t be surprised when it surprises you yes the wonderful trash 80 here for a thousand bucks as features You don’t expect from a computer costing under a grand now features like automatic line numbering sixteen-digit accuracy and formatted print New numeric keypad oh my god comes with a Being a DIK Season 1 torrent.

That’s really cool I was hoping that it had some computer ads in here and there is one We’re in a whole lot of computers to choose from and this is pretty much the only one radio jack was selling at the time, so Trs-80 quick printer now this is something. I’ve actually never seen what is that 150 lines per minute 20 40 or 80 characters per line? learned program basic statistical analysis double-precision subroutines Computers And I you know not a game listed Not a single piece of like interesting software as far as like what I would go for but that’s okay That’s just great though equipped with accessories below it can fill many needs for the educator scientist program or even large business owner You can tell who they were going for here educators scientists programmers and business owners.

Got some little weather radios digital clocks a compact Being a DIK Season 1 stereo system I see those from time to time at thrift stores. Those are They are kind of appealing because they’re just like a little small like electronic wood grain box that does the radio and it’s about it New This is pretty interesting now 32 calls automatic memory dialer makes calling push-button easy no more time wasted To dialing numbers eliminates repeatedly looking up the same number ah what? They programmed office mom married church jonbi babysitter pharmacy dentist service station bank broker weather And of course you got your emergency stuff in there. It’s an amusing list that they chose It even dials area codes tells you the time elapsed as digital Clock is the future guys and then these are just fun like old intercoms you ever find a good pair of If all the intercoms a– I’d recommend grabbing them and trying it out and here we go is more some more Sciency things I get some science fair kits solid-state power supply with remote sensing. That’s pretty sweet photo relay detection system Silent round-the-clock century works as an alarm against intruders put a beam of light to work for you. I Love it Custom design your own soldering iron. This is the kind of crap you just don’t see anywhere anymore as far as like an actual store go on a Radio Shack and design your own soldering iron, man This makes all the nerdiness just float up to the top you know, and I just want to you know make a kit of electronics and Just put it together, and it does nothing but make a sound But I would be satisfied don’t become a statistic smoke can kill you fire authorities studies show that most victims Redden’s Dire before the flames even reach them all man. Where is as is a sale does that mean? Deep price cuts on everything eyes closeout stuff So is the junk you really want to get rid of so here?

It is some really cheap like record players and am/FM things a mini pocket recorder a mini micro mini set pocket recorder Rechargeable drill that’s cool didn’t know that those were around at that point but sure and they last little bit here than one plug on walkie-talkie because why not RadioShack and We’re close by come in and get your neighborhood store Get acquainted all these states There was no one in North Carolina where I am so I mean, maybe they were but it’s not listed here That’s interesting. I thought that would have been more, but maybe this is just a small selection of particular radio shacks Well anyway that is really it for this particular episode of Being a DIK Season 1 are just want to do it taking a look back add some Radio Shack because it’s fun and the companies Well, and they’re not doing well.

I don’t know what if they’re gonna come back or not But probably not and who knows so with Radio Shack. There’s like a zombie of electronic stores.

The Insurance Society of New York

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

The subject of insurance forms is such an exceedingly broad one, that it will be impossible in an address such as this to do more than touch upon it in a general way, and direct attention to some of the more important forms, which, although in general use, may possess features which are not fully understood.
The best form, whether viewed from the standpoint of the insurance company or the insured, is a fair form, one which expresses in clear, unambiguous language the mutual intention of the parties, and affords no cause for surprise on the part of either, after a loss has occurred. But the prepara¬ tion of such a form is not always an easy task, and it is right at this point that the ability of the broker and the underwriter come into play.
A distinguished Englishman declared that the English Constitution was the greatest production that had ever been conceived by the brain of man, but it was subjected to the most scathing criticism and violent assaults by Bentham, the great subversive critic of English law. Twenty-five years ago the New York Standard Policy was prepared by the best legal and lay talent in the insurance, world, and the greatest care was taken to present not only a reasonable and fair form of contract between the insurer and the insured, but one which could be easily read and understood.
While no such extravagant claims have been made for the Standard Policy as were made for the “Matchless Con-maximum of loss collection with a minimum of co-insurance or other resistance than a present day broker, he has not yet been discovered.
The ornate policies in use thirty years ago, with no uniformity in conditions, with their classification of hazards which no one could understand and their fine print which few could read, have given way to plainly printed uniform Standard Policies with materially simplified conditions. But the written portion of the insurance contract owing to our commercial and industrial growth, instead of becoming more simple, has taken exactly the opposite direction, and we now have covering under a single policy or set of policies, the entire property of a coal and mining company, the breweries, public service or traction lines of a whole city and the fixed property, rolling stock and common carrier liability of an entire railroad system involving millions of dollars and con¬ taining items numbering into the thousands. This forcibly illustrates the evolution of the policy form since the issue of the first fire insurance contract by an American company one hundred and sixty years ago, in favor of a gentleman bearing the familiar name of John Smith, covering
“500 £ on his dwelling house on the east side of King Street, between Mulberry and Sassafras, 30 feet front, 40 feet deep, brick, 9-inch party walls, three stories in height, plas¬ tered partitions, open newel bracket stairs, pent houses with board ceilings, garrets finished, three stories, painted brick kitchen, two stories in height, 15 feet 9 inches front, 19 feet 6 inches deep, dresser, shelves, wainscot closet fronts, shingling 1-5 worn.”
It will be observed that in the matter of verbiage this primitive form rivals some of our present day household furniture forms and all will agree that this particular dwelling might have been covered just as effectually and identified quite as easily without such an elaborate description.
Any one who has an insurable interest in property should be permitted to have any form of contract that he is willing to pay for, provided it is not contrary to law or against public policy, and judging from a contract of insurance issued by a certain office not long ago the insuring public apparently has no difficulty in securing any kind of a policy it may desire at any price it may be willing to pay. The contract in ques¬ tion was one for £20,000, covering stock against loss from any cause, except theft on the part of employes, anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, on land or water, without any con¬ ditions, restrictions or limitations whatsoever, written at less than one-half the Exchange rate in the insured’s place of business. An insurance agent upon being asked whether he thought it was good, said that if the company was anywhere near as good as the form, it was all that could be desired, but vouchsafed the opinion that it looked altogether too good to be good.

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

In these days we frequently find concentrated within the walls of a single structure one set of fire insurance policies covering on building, another on leasehold interest, another on rents or rental value—and in addition to this, policies for various tenants covering stock, fixtures, improvements, profits and use and occupancy, subject to the 100% average or co-insurance clause, to say nothing of steam boiler, casualty and liability insurance, thereby entirely eliminating the ele¬ ment of personal risk on the part of the owners, and produc¬ ing a situation which will account in some measure for the 17,000 annual fire alarms and $15,000,000 fire loss in New York City; $230,000,000 annual fire loss in the country at large, and for the constantly increasing percentage of cases where there are two or more fires in the same building and two or more claims from the same claimant.
The most common and perhaps least understood phrase found in policies of fire insurance is what is known as the “Commission Clause,” which reads “his own or held by him in trust or on commission or sold but not delivered” or “re¬ moved.” This clause in one form or another has been in use for many years, and it was originally the impression of un¬ derwriters that owing to the personal nature of the insurance contract a policy thus worded would simply cover the prop¬ erty of the insured and his interest in the property of others, such as advances and storage charges, but the courts have disabused their minds of any such narrow interpretation and have placed such a liberal construction upon the words “held in trust” that they may be justly regarded as among the broadest in the insurance language and scarcely less com¬ prehensive than the familiar term “for account of whom it may concern”; in fact, the principles controlling one phrase are similar to those governing the other.
It has been held that whether a merchant or bailee has assumed responsibility, or agreed to keep the property cov¬ ered or whether he is legally liable or not, if his policies contain the words “held in trust,” the owner may, after a fire, by merely ratifying the insurance of the bailee, appro¬ priate that for which he paid nothing whatever and may file proofs and bring suit in his own name against the bailee’s insurers. Nor is this all, for in some jurisdictions, if the bailee fails to include the loss on property of the bailor in his claim against his insurers, or if he does include it and the amount of insurance collectible is less than the total loss, the bailee may not first reimburse himself for the loss on his own goods and hold the balance in trust for the owners, but must prorate the amount actually collected with those own¬ ers who may have adopted the insurance, although, if he has a lien on any of the goods for charges or advances, this may be deducted from the proportion of insurance money due such owners The phrase “for account of whom it may concern” was formerly confined almost entirely to marine insurance, but in recent years there has been an increasing tendency to intro¬ duce it into policies of fire insurance.
All authorities are agreed that the interests protected by a policy containing these words must have been within the contemplation of him who took out the policy at the time it was issued. It is not necessary that he should have in¬ tended it for the benefit of some then known and particular individuals, but it would include such classes of persons as were intended to be included and who these were may be shown by parol. The owners or others intended to be cov¬ ered may ratify the insurance after a loss and take the bene¬ fit of it, though ignorant of its existence at the time of the issuance of the policy, just the same as under the term “held in trust.”
The words “for account of whom it may concern” are not limited in their protection to those persons who were concerned at the time the insurance was taken out, but will protect those having an insurable interest and who are con¬ cerned at the time when the loss occurs. They will cover the interest of a subsequent purchaser of a part or the whole of the property and supersede the alienation clause of the policy (U. S. S. C.), Hagan and Martin vs. Scottish Union and National Ins. Co., 32 Ins. Law Journal, p. 47; 186 U. S. 423).
A contract of insurance written in the name of “John Doe & Co. for account of whom it may concern” should contain a clause reading “Loss, if any, to be adjusted with and payable to John Doe & Co.,” not “loss, if any, payable to them” or “loss, if any, payable to the assured,” as forms sometimes read.
Policies are frequently written in the name of a bailee covering “On merchandise, his own and on the property of others for which he is responsible,” or “for which he may be liable”—and it has been held that’the effect of these words is to limit the liability of the insurer to the loss on the assured’s own goods and to his legal liability for loss on goods belonging to others, but the words “for which they are or may be liable” have been passed upon by the Supreme Court of Illinois, and they have been given an entirely dif¬ ferent interpretation. That tribunal in the case of The Home Insurance Company vs. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. (28 Insurance Law Journal, p. 289; 178 Ills. 64) decided that the words quoted were merely descriptive of the cars to be insured; that the word “liable” as used in the policy did not signify a perfected or fixed legal liability, but rather a con¬ dition out of which a legal liability might arise.
As illustrative of its position the court said that an assignor of a negotiable note may, with no incorrectness of speech, be said to be liable upon his assignment obligation is not an absolute fixed legal liability but is con¬ tingent upon the financial condition of the maker; and ac¬ cordingly held that the insurance company was liable for loss on all the cars in the possession of the railroad company, notwithstanding the fact that the latter was not legally liable to the owners.
In view of the exceedingly broad construction which the courts have placed upon the time honored and familiar phrases to which reference has been made, it is important for the party insured, whether it be a railroad or other transportation company, a warehouseman, a laundryman, a tailor, a com¬ mission merchant or other bailee, to determine before the fire whether he desires the insurance to be so broad in its cover as to embrace not only his own property and interest, but also the property of everybody else which may happen to be in his custody; if so, he should be careful to insure for a sufficiently large amount to meet all possible co-insurance conditions,, and if he wishes to make sure of being fully reimbursed for his own loss, his only safe course is to insure for the full value of all the property in his possession.
At this point the inquiry which naturally presents itself is, how should a policy be written if a merchant, warehouse¬ man or other bailee desires to protect his own interest but not the interest of any one else? The following form is suggested: “On merchandise his own, and on his interest in and on his legal liability for property held by him in trust or on commission or on joint account with others, or sold but not removed, or on storage or for repairs, while con¬ tained, etc.” This will, it is believed, limit the operation of co-insurance conditions and at the same time prevent the owners from adopting, appropriating or helping themselves to the bailee’s insurance, for which they pay nothing and to which they are not equitably entitled.
Many of the household furniture forms now in use, in addition to embracing almost every conceivable kind of per¬ sonal property except that specifically prohibited by the pol¬ icy conditions, are also made to cover similar property be¬ longing to any member of the family or household, visitors, guests and servants.
This form would seem to indicate considerable ingenu¬ ity on the part of the broker, broad liberality on the part of the insurance company and commendable generosity on the part of the insured, and the latter would probably feel more than compensated by being able to reimburse his guest for any fire damage he might sustain while enjoying his hospi¬ tality, but the amount of insurance carried under such a form should anticipate the possibility of his having a number of guests at one time and a corresponding increase in the value at risk.
It must be borne in mind that in localities where co- insurance conditions prevail the value of property belonging

Urtuk The Desolation Fitgirl Repack

Urtuk The Desolation Download PC Game

Urtuk The Desolation Fitgirl Repack Free Download PC Game final version or you can say the latest update is released for PC. And the best this about this DLC is that it’s free to download. In this tutorial, we will show you how to download and Install Urtuk The Desolation Torrent for free. Before you download and install this awesome game on your computer note that this game is highly compressed and is the repack version of this game.

Download Urtuk The Desolation Fit girl repack is free to play the game. Yes, you can get this game for free. Now there are different websites from which you can download Urtuk The Desolation igg games and ocean of games are the two most popular websites. Also, ova games and the skidrow reloaded also provide you to download this awesome game.

Urtuk The Desolation for Android and iOS?

Yes, you can download Urtuk The Desolation on your Android and iOS platform and again they are also free to download.

Also Read:

How To download and Install Urtuk The Desolation

Now to download and Install Urtuk The Desolation for free on your PC you have to follow below-given steps. If there is a problem then you can comment down below in the comment section we will love to help you on this.

  1. First, you have to download Urtuk The Desolation on your PC. You can find the download button at the top of the post.
  2. Now the download page will open. There you have to log in. Once you login the download process will start automatically.
  3. If you are unable to download this game then make sure you have deactivated your Adblocker. Otherwise, you will not be able to download Urtuk The Desolation Fitgirl game on to your PC.
  4. Now if you want to watch the Urtuk The Desolation Fitgirl game Installation video and Troubleshooting tutorial then head over to the next section.

TROUBLESHOOTING Urtuk The Desolation Download

Screenshots  (Tap To Enlarge)

 Now if you are interested in the screenshots then tap down on the picture to enlarge them.

 

Urtuk The Desolation Fitgirl
Urtuk The Desolation Fitgirl
Urtuk The Desolation Fitgirl
Urtuk The Desolation Fitgirl

Urtuk The Desolation Gameplay and Review

That’s something I have never ever run across in a thrift store realistic is just not a brand that I see very often and as far as keyboards Rep like a pro this Christmas aha yeah with your Urtuk The Desolation game download Realistic concert mate 800 wrap up your gift list huh With 25 tones 30 rhythms three drum pads dual sound scratch table and a mic I’m using I’m not really sure how that works I’d kind of love to pick one of those up, to be honest, and then I would send it to a bit keys because That’s just not my expertise area at all Here we go through.

These are awesome. I remember these little science kits is one of those things It’s like I wanted and then you get it. Just like I don’t know what to do with this I got chemistry set and I had one of those and I didn’t know what to do with that Oh here We go LCD action games for all ages tabletop space alien table die baseball tabletop football Executive consultant great for those difficult decisions. What was with these I? Reviewed one of these on odd where it was a little different form factor obviously But these executive consultant devices are confusing just the toss-up You might as well use a magic 8-ball, which I did in that video stress Eliminator sound off during stressful situations with zapper Urtuk The Desolation PC download alien laser shot bombs away quick shot or blaster Why if there was an executive with one of those on his desk?

I would probably be questioning the executive decisions Anyway, we have some exciting action toys all of these like remember laser pistol and space pistol and laser sword and the electronic rifle is all look like just the most generic things and Honestly, that’s kind of why I find them so charming like what is this puppy watch It’s not any branded anything. There’s nothing tying this to anything futuristic galactic man electronic pick-up sticks Handheld rap mic. There are another one of those things great gift for pint-sized rap masters Let them rap like a pro. This is 1991 all right pet a bull radios. It’s a radio inside of a stuffed animal That’s amusing oh Here we go These are pretty cool. That was one thing I always loved going into Radio Shack for the Urtuk The Desolation ocean of games was because of all the remote-control cars sometimes They would have them like like actually set up, and you could play them and stuff that was pretty rad Remote-controlled dinosaur, that’s a two-foot-tall dinosaur. That’s pretty awesome.

I would still buy one of those I don’t know who they contracted to like making these and maybe they made them in-house. I don’t know it was seen on TV though Turbo Raceway sees the battle spell in math It’s like a Speak & Spells that like not all these weird little not quite licensed things check this out Stack challenge game stack the bricks, and win yeah, we can’t call it Urtuk The Desolation torrent. You know his Tetris we know his Tetris, but we’re not gonna tell you because Issues That’s radios, Jack. It’s wonderful well that was the Urtuk The Desolation fitgirl repack, but let’s go back even further and take a look at the 1979 Spring Sale from Radio Shack here starting with the compact 2-way hi-fi speaker system by realistic with a trumpet I Guess I don’t know I mean why is that there just because it has a tweeter.

Put an instrument on there and all them automatically that’s better either way. That’s some fantastic covering for the speaker there and the wood grain I’m hoping there’s gonna be a lot of I know there’s gonna be a lot of wood grain in here, so All sorts of 8-track stuff straight away. We got Porter blade tracks car 8-track players, oh Yeah, 8-track cartridge cases blank tapes and lazy’s isn’t sweet Like it costs 259 for an 80-minute blank 8-track and a dollar ninety-nine for a 40-minute. This is pretty sweet 8-track deck with Dolby Asterisk who’s the asterisk I’ll Urtuk The Desolation torrent noise reduction well, of course, I don’t know why I’ll say it could have meant With Dolby like a guy named Dolby it comes with him What does this come with VU meters dual lighted glow red during record orange during playback? Oh, that’s a cool feature. I like that anyway Yeah, we got CB radios because of course, I gotta say I like this one telephone-type mobile CB Like like I have a car phone except not yeah, man people want a car phone so bad telephone-type C V console that thing is Intense imagine just going down the road and seeing somebody with a full-size like handheld telephone receiver Like whoa?

What does that person from the future? What is this is 1979? More stereos and these I gotta say are a million times more appealing than the ones in the Urtuk The Desolation these look good I would happily take any of these if they were like brand-new conditions even though they’re realistic and probably not the best Manual stereo phone. I want a pedestal the heck is this look at that thing That’s wild. I want that limited-edition sound Odyssey direct to disc to enjoy these big hits What star wars team evergreen 2001 theme from Rocky the way we were or the way we were Chef themed SWAT team Lady Sings the Blues all on one record for 417 are 497 holy nuts.

That’s a weird selection at the Disco sweep clean your records with a sweeping disco Tron 1979 Disco all the things Peak of the action with a pocket Skinner Urtuk The Desolation free download PC Game marine VHF, whether police fire all sorts of cool little things variable squelch Yeah more things today. Need variable squelch as a feature FM radio cassette player for your car.

That’s pretty awesome Like seriously that thing looks awesome. I like that a little indicator right there for ya easy view dual F M dials dual dials. It’s just like this thing That’s neat and these folks here with their your supercool car that car’s not really super cool at all But I would still own it The best an auto sound new super radar detector 200 bucks Modern styled in – quartz digital car clock Elegant style blends with any interior, that’s an elegant style right there. It’s a rectangle oh And The centerfold is quite appropriate in this one – just wood grain for miles – sensational stereo receiver buys those are both some slick-looking receivers I gotta say it’s interesting to see like a shiny black with Urtuk The Desolation like that. You know. I don’t really see this Super often. I usually see like at least some more Silvery metal trim around the black if that’s the case, but this was just like on black on Urtuk The Desolation I kind of like that it’s nice Okay, so all this is like the Radio Shack II type of components now you notice that was really kind of missing from the 90s catalog But this is what a lot of Radio Shack was known for especially in the Urtuk The Desolation Was just all of these little components like check it out.

The Insurance Society of New York

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

The subject of insurance forms is such an exceedingly broad one, that it will be impossible in an address such as this to do more than touch upon it in a general way, and direct attention to some of the more important forms, which, although in general use, may possess features which are not fully understood.
The best form, whether viewed from the standpoint of the insurance company or the insured, is a fair form, one which expresses in clear, unambiguous language the mutual intention of the parties, and affords no cause for surprise on the part of either, after a loss has occurred. But the prepara¬ tion of such a form is not always an easy task, and it is right at this point that the ability of the broker and the underwriter come into play.
A distinguished Englishman declared that the English Constitution was the greatest production that had ever been conceived by the brain of man, but it was subjected to the most scathing criticism and violent assaults by Bentham, the great subversive critic of English law. Twenty-five years ago the New York Standard Policy was prepared by the best legal and lay talent in the insurance, world, and the greatest care was taken to present not only a reasonable and fair form of contract between the insurer and the insured, but one which could be easily read and understood.
While no such extravagant claims have been made for the Standard Policy as were made for the “Matchless Con-maximum of loss collection with a minimum of co-insurance or other resistance than a present day broker, he has not yet been discovered.
The ornate policies in use thirty years ago, with no uniformity in conditions, with their classification of hazards which no one could understand and their fine print which few could read, have given way to plainly printed uniform Standard Policies with materially simplified conditions. But the written portion of the insurance contract owing to our commercial and industrial growth, instead of becoming more simple, has taken exactly the opposite direction, and we now have covering under a single policy or set of policies, the entire property of a coal and mining company, the breweries, public service or traction lines of a whole city and the fixed property, rolling stock and common carrier liability of an entire railroad system involving millions of dollars and con¬ taining items numbering into the thousands. This forcibly illustrates the evolution of the policy form since the issue of the first fire insurance contract by an American company one hundred and sixty years ago, in favor of a gentleman bearing the familiar name of John Smith, covering
“500 £ on his dwelling house on the east side of King Street, between Mulberry and Sassafras, 30 feet front, 40 feet deep, brick, 9-inch party walls, three stories in height, plas¬ tered partitions, open newel bracket stairs, pent houses with board ceilings, garrets finished, three stories, painted brick kitchen, two stories in height, 15 feet 9 inches front, 19 feet 6 inches deep, dresser, shelves, wainscot closet fronts, shingling 1-5 worn.”
It will be observed that in the matter of verbiage this primitive form rivals some of our present day household furniture forms and all will agree that this particular dwelling might have been covered just as effectually and identified quite as easily without such an elaborate description.
Any one who has an insurable interest in property should be permitted to have any form of contract that he is willing to pay for, provided it is not contrary to law or against public policy, and judging from a contract of insurance issued by a certain office not long ago the insuring public apparently has no difficulty in securing any kind of a policy it may desire at any price it may be willing to pay. The contract in ques¬ tion was one for £20,000, covering stock against loss from any cause, except theft on the part of employes, anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, on land or water, without any con¬ ditions, restrictions or limitations whatsoever, written at less than one-half the Exchange rate in the insured’s place of business. An insurance agent upon being asked whether he thought it was good, said that if the company was anywhere near as good as the form, it was all that could be desired, but vouchsafed the opinion that it looked altogether too good to be good.

The Insurance Society of New York
The Insurance Society of New York

In these days we frequently find concentrated within the walls of a single structure one set of fire insurance policies covering on building, another on leasehold interest, another on rents or rental value—and in addition to this, policies for various tenants covering stock, fixtures, improvements, profits and use and occupancy, subject to the 100% average or co-insurance clause, to say nothing of steam boiler, casualty and liability insurance, thereby entirely eliminating the ele¬ ment of personal risk on the part of the owners, and produc¬ ing a situation which will account in some measure for the 17,000 annual fire alarms and $15,000,000 fire loss in New York City; $230,000,000 annual fire loss in the country at large, and for the constantly increasing percentage of cases where there are two or more fires in the same building and two or more claims from the same claimant.
The most common and perhaps least understood phrase found in policies of fire insurance is what is known as the “Commission Clause,” which reads “his own or held by him in trust or on commission or sold but not delivered” or “re¬ moved.” This clause in one form or another has been in use for many years, and it was originally the impression of un¬ derwriters that owing to the personal nature of the insurance contract a policy thus worded would simply cover the prop¬ erty of the insured and his interest in the property of others, such as advances and storage charges, but the courts have disabused their minds of any such narrow interpretation and have placed such a liberal construction upon the words “held in trust” that they may be justly regarded as among the broadest in the insurance language and scarcely less com¬ prehensive than the familiar term “for account of whom it may concern”; in fact, the principles controlling one phrase are similar to those governing the other.
It has been held that whether a merchant or bailee has assumed responsibility, or agreed to keep the property cov¬ ered or whether he is legally liable or not, if his policies contain the words “held in trust,” the owner may, after a fire, by merely ratifying the insurance of the bailee, appro¬ priate that for which he paid nothing whatever and may file proofs and bring suit in his own name against the bailee’s insurers. Nor is this all, for in some jurisdictions, if the bailee fails to include the loss on property of the bailor in his claim against his insurers, or if he does include it and the amount of insurance collectible is less than the total loss, the bailee may not first reimburse himself for the loss on his own goods and hold the balance in trust for the owners, but must prorate the amount actually collected with those own¬ ers who may have adopted the insurance, although, if he has a lien on any of the goods for charges or advances, this may be deducted from the proportion of insurance money due such owners The phrase “for account of whom it may concern” was formerly confined almost entirely to marine insurance, but in recent years there has been an increasing tendency to intro¬ duce it into policies of fire insurance.
All authorities are agreed that the interests protected by a policy containing these words must have been within the contemplation of him who took out the policy at the time it was issued. It is not necessary that he should have in¬ tended it for the benefit of some then known and particular individuals, but it would include such classes of persons as were intended to be included and who these were may be shown by parol. The owners or others intended to be cov¬ ered may ratify the insurance after a loss and take the bene¬ fit of it, though ignorant of its existence at the time of the issuance of the policy, just the same as under the term “held in trust.”
The words “for account of whom it may concern” are not limited in their protection to those persons who were concerned at the time the insurance was taken out, but will protect those having an insurable interest and who are con¬ cerned at the time when the loss occurs. They will cover the interest of a subsequent purchaser of a part or the whole of the property and supersede the alienation clause of the policy (U. S. S. C.), Hagan and Martin vs. Scottish Union and National Ins. Co., 32 Ins. Law Journal, p. 47; 186 U. S. 423).
A contract of insurance written in the name of “John Doe & Co. for account of whom it may concern” should contain a clause reading “Loss, if any, to be adjusted with and payable to John Doe & Co.,” not “loss, if any, payable to them” or “loss, if any, payable to the assured,” as forms sometimes read.
Policies are frequently written in the name of a bailee covering “On merchandise, his own and on the property of others for which he is responsible,” or “for which he may be liable”—and it has been held that’the effect of these words is to limit the liability of the insurer to the loss on the assured’s own goods and to his legal liability for loss on goods belonging to others, but the words “for which they are or may be liable” have been passed upon by the Supreme Court of Illinois, and they have been given an entirely dif¬ ferent interpretation. That tribunal in the case of The Home Insurance Company vs. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. (28 Insurance Law Journal, p. 289; 178 Ills. 64) decided that the words quoted were merely descriptive of the cars to be insured; that the word “liable” as used in the policy did not signify a perfected or fixed legal liability, but rather a con¬ dition out of which a legal liability might arise.
As illustrative of its position the court said that an assignor of a negotiable note may, with no incorrectness of speech, be said to be liable upon his assignment obligation is not an absolute fixed legal liability but is con¬ tingent upon the financial condition of the maker; and ac¬ cordingly held that the insurance company was liable for loss on all the cars in the possession of the railroad company, notwithstanding the fact that the latter was not legally liable to the owners.
In view of the exceedingly broad construction which the courts have placed upon the time honored and familiar phrases to which reference has been made, it is important for the party insured, whether it be a railroad or other transportation company, a warehouseman, a laundryman, a tailor, a com¬ mission merchant or other bailee, to determine before the fire whether he desires the insurance to be so broad in its cover as to embrace not only his own property and interest, but also the property of everybody else which may happen to be in his custody; if so, he should be careful to insure for a sufficiently large amount to meet all possible co-insurance conditions,, and if he wishes to make sure of being fully reimbursed for his own loss, his only safe course is to insure for the full value of all the property in his possession.
At this point the inquiry which naturally presents itself is, how should a policy be written if a merchant, warehouse¬ man or other bailee desires to protect his own interest but not the interest of any one else? The following form is suggested: “On merchandise his own, and on his interest in and on his legal liability for property held by him in trust or on commission or on joint account with others, or sold but not removed, or on storage or for repairs, while con¬ tained, etc.” This will, it is believed, limit the operation of co-insurance conditions and at the same time prevent the owners from adopting, appropriating or helping themselves to the bailee’s insurance, for which they pay nothing and to which they are not equitably entitled.
Many of the household furniture forms now in use, in addition to embracing almost every conceivable kind of per¬ sonal property except that specifically prohibited by the pol¬ icy conditions, are also made to cover similar property be¬ longing to any member of the family or household, visitors, guests and servants.
This form would seem to indicate considerable ingenu¬ ity on the part of the broker, broad liberality on the part of the insurance company and commendable generosity on the part of the insured, and the latter would probably feel more than compensated by being able to reimburse his guest for any fire damage he might sustain while enjoying his hospi¬ tality, but the amount of insurance carried under such a form should anticipate the possibility of his having a number of guests at one time and a corresponding increase in the value at risk.
It must be borne in mind that in localities where co- insurance conditions prevail the value of property belonging