God of War 2 Fitgirl Repack PC

Genres/Tags: Action, Slasher, Third-person, 3D
Companies: Santa Monica Studio, PlayStation PC LLC
Languages: RUS/ENG/MULTI18
This game REQUIRES Windows 10+ Fix for Win7/8.1 below
Original Size: 40.3 GB
Repack Size: from 26 GB (Selective Download)

God of War 2 Fitgirl Repack Download PC Game

God of War II Fitgirl Repack Free Download PC Game final version or you can say the latest update is released for PC. And the best this about this DLC is that it’s free to download. In this tutorial, we will show you how to download and Install God of War II Torrent for free. Before you download and install this awesome game on your computer note that this game is highly compressed and is the repack version of this game.

Download God of War II Fit girl repack is free to play the game. Yes you can get this game for free. Now there are different websites from which you can download God of War II igg games and the ocean of games are the two most popular websites. Also, ova games and the skidrow reloaded also provide you to download God of War II  Fitgirl awesome game.

Download Mirrors God of War 2 Fitgirl Repack PC

  • 1337x | [magnet] [.torrent file only]
  • RuTor [magnet]
  • Tapochek.net
  • Filehoster: MultiUpload (10+ hosters, interchangeable) [Use JDownloader2]
  • Filehoster: ZippyShare
  • Filehoster: BayFiles
  • Filehoster: OneDrive (Uploaded by DyR0 t(-_-t), NOT compatible with other mirrors)
  • Filehosters: Google Drive, OneDrive + others (Uploaded by crackhub213)

Watch Trailer

God of War II is an action-adventure game with hack-and-slash gameplay that is the successor to God of War video game on PlayStation 2. PlayStation 2. It came out to North America on March 13 in 2007, and on March 13, 2007, in Europe in Europe on the 27th of April and May 3 in Australia. This North American NTSC version of God of War II is available as a two-disc set. The first disc includes the game, while another disc deals with the development of the game with a diary detailing the production of the game. The Australian/European PAL version is available in two versions that include a single disc standard edition , and two disc “Special Edition” that comes with a different box unlike that of the one-disc edition. It also comes with different box designs as well as a bonus DVD and the PAL version of the game.

God of War II won a Golden Joystick for “PlayStation Game of the Year 2007” at the 2007 Golden Joystick Awards.

Gameplay

Gameplay in God of War II is identical to the predecessor. The player is able to control Kratos using a mix of combat as well as platforming and puzzle game elements. It also retains the concept of minigames that allow players to make bloody killings. A second element that’s been incorporated from the game before was Kratos ability to hunt for red Orbs to upgrade his weapons and magic , and Gorgon Eyes as well as Phoenix Feathers to boost his magic and health levels.

As with the first God of War, Kratos receives numerous weapons and powers of magic through his journey, either granted to him by specific characters, or inherited from his foes. These items are a small improvement in the game’s gameplay over God of War for example, Icarus The Wings (an item that was removed out of the game) that allow players to glide over short distances as well as or the Golden Fleece, which lets players repel projectiles, as well as the Blades of Athena, an item that was introduced in the original game that allows players to move around from objects highlighted.

God of War IItakes place shortly following that of the God of War: Ghost of Sparta however, it is more than 13 years following those events in the God of War; Kratos after defeating Ares and becoming god of war. of War, but unfortunately is not recognized by other Gods because of his cruel treatment of different Greek city-states. Kratos remains troubled by his memories of crimes he committed during his time serving under Ares. He is able to enjoy himself the only way to do so help and lead the Spartan force in the fight against Greece. Athena demands to make Kratos quit and tells him that she can no longer protect him from the wrath and ire of Odympus in the future, and that he must not be averse to her since it was she who gave him the status of an immortal god. Kratos responds that he has no obligation to her, and then descends into fight Rhodes for the purpose of helping help the troops of his Spartan army.

Kratos participates in the fight as the form of God and starts to destroy his city Rhodes. After a brief time, Kratos notices an Eagle which Kratos believes is Athena disguised. The bird robs Kratos of his legendary height, and transforms with the Colossus that is Rhodes and then bringing the creature to life, causing it to take out Kratos.

After a long-running battle with the giant of metal that is raging across cities, Zeus provides Kratos his Blade of Olympus that Zeus himself employed to end his battle in the Great War between the gods as well as his fellow Titans. At Zeus at his behest, Kratos infuses the Blade with godhood, making his mortal, but enabling him to take down the Colossus through the inside. But, Kratos soon finds himself severely wounded after being smashed by the sever hand of the statue.

Kratos realizes that he has to find his Blade of Olympus to save himself. After he rises and plods to his sword Zeus appears as an Eagle who stole his power and did not trust Kratos to ensure that his fate wouldn’t be as fateful as Ares’. Zeus is then stabs his Blade of Olympus into Kratos heart, killing him once the god refuses to remain forever with the Gods.

But, when Kratos is being pulled towards the eternal torment of the Underworld Kratos gets saved from his fate by Gaia who is her mother to the Titans and also the narrator of the franchise who suggests an alliance. Gaia describes the tale of Zeus and the way Cronos, Zeus’ father consumed all of his children in order to defy the prophecy that one his children would rise up against him. Gaia also tells the way Rhea, Zeus’ mother she saved her son and took him to an island which was actually Gaia who was Gaia, Titaness mother of Earth and Zeus his grandmother. Gaia was the one who nurtured Zeus until he grew up to be a man , and was determined to take revenge on Cronos and the other Titans. When it became clear that the Great War between the Gods and the Titans began to unfold, Zeus soon created a powerful weapon known as”the Blade of Olympus for the purpose of win this Great War and with the Blade it drove all Titans to the deeps of Tartarus.

The Titans fell to defeat by Gods and punished, they were and humiliated. Now they are seeking Kratos to help them exact revenge. Kratos escapes from the Underworld and is enticed by Gaia to locate The Sisters of Fate to help him change his past and avoid his treachery and end up killing Zeus. She offers Kratos assistance from the mythical Pegasus, the horse Pegasus in order to help him travel through the mountains to reach the Sisters.

Kratos and Pegasus following an excursion to a mountain which houses Titan Typhon and the former Titan Typhon as well as the ex Titan Prometheus, begin flying toward The Island of Creation, however, they are attacked again with Griffins and Ravens with the help of their ally, the Dark Rider. The Dark Rider succeeds in smashing into Pegasus and sending the horse to death, however Kratos responds by leaping on The Dark Griffin, killing the Dark Rider with the Spear of Destiny and taking out The Dark Griffin by lodging the spear into its neck before Kratos plunges into his death on the Island of Creation below.

When he wanders around his island Kratos is confronted by the likes Theseus and Theseus, who Kratos is killed and receives the Key of the Horse Keeper and the Steeds of Time (a gift to the Sisters of Fate from Cronos in an effort to alter his own destiny), Perseus, whom is brutally killed and who takes his shield that reflects to advance as the captain of the ship at the beginning in the story of God of War, and the Barbarian King, whom he killed in the first God of War, from which he acquires his Barbarian Hammer. Kratos also comes across a grubby and mad Icarus who takes the Icarus wings from and also his Gorgon Queen Euryale who is from whom he obtained the head of Euryale by killing.

Kratos arrives on Titan Atlas beneath the surface and attempts to talk to the Titan Atlas. Initial Atlas resents the appearance of the Spartan and refuses to aid Kratos determined to crush the human to escape his prisoner since their last encounter during God of War: Chains of Olympus. But, Kratos manages to persuade Atlas to aid him in order that he can alter his fate and take down Zeus. After Zeus the Titan taking the proposal and granting Kratos the new power known as”the Atlas Quake and helps him return to the surface so the quest can continue. When he reaches the surface, Kratos is killed by Kraken Kraken and awakens to the Phoenix and allows it to fly toward The Temple of Fates with his desire to retaliate against Zeus and knowledge of Zeus destruction of Sparta causes an outrage that allows him to pursue his journey. After reaching his destination, the Throne in the Throne Room, Kratos expresses his determined determination to alter his destiny, as well as the fate of Zeus who is Zeus, the King of Gods of Olympus and the Sisters refuse to let him through. Kratos will then face Lahkesis.

Following a brutal fight, Kratos stands witness as the middle sister Atropos emerges from the defeated Lahkesis and takes Kratos into the present until the moment when he fought Ares. In the hopes of making his life a snooze by taking down Atropos’s Blade of the Gods, Kratos interferes by fighting his Blade of the Gods, so that things remain as they used to be. He eventually beats Atropos before returning to the present, leaving Atropos stuck in an illusion of mirror. He is now fighting Lahkesis and Atropos simultaneously, Kratos manages to stab the two Sisters with his knives and smash the mirror they’re trapped in. In the process, he kills them by eliminating the sisters from existence.

Kratos continues to make his way to the sister who is left, Clotho, who is in charge of and protects his position as the Loom of Fate, which governs the lives of mortals as well as Gods alike. After tying Clotho’s hands down to the surface, Kratos manages to impale her skull with a huge swinging pendulum-like blade, resulting in the death of the third sister. After the demise of all Three Sisters of Fates, Kratos took control of his Loom and his destiny. He returns to the point of his death at Zeus at the hands of Rhodes to save his previous self as well as returning his Blade of Olympus from a stunned Zeus which leads to a lengthy struggle with Zeus, the King of Gods. After the combat, Zeus stuns Kratos with an intense lighting storm. Kratos then declares falsely that the god of war surrenders. When Zeus is poised to kill Kratos and he tries to deflect the punch with an energy blast, and holds Zeus’s hands against the rock with the Blades of Athena. Kratos then grabs The Blade of Olympus and begins cutting it into Zeus the chest of Zeus.

Before he can complete his mission, Athena arrives and defends Zeus However, Kratos is furious at her intervention when Athena declares her intention to defend Olympus. The wounded Zeus will not let go and declares that Kratos is waging war that which he cannot win. But, Kratos breaks free of the defense of Athena and begins to charge toward Zeus using his Blade of Olympus, but Athena sacrifices herself by putting herself on the blade, and granting Zeus freedom. An astonished Kratos is unsure of why she did this , as the goddess who is dying reveals that Zeus is attempting to end the cycle of sons killing father, and this cycle goes back to Cronos winning over Uranus and Zeus winning over Cronos. In taking out Kratos before he could kill the man, Zeus had hoped to end the cycle, and thus making it clear that Kratos is actually, Zeus’ own son and begs Kratos to renounce his quest to avenge himself.

In a moment of shocked and ashamed, Kratos darkens and snarls that he does not have a father. Athena is killed in Kratos arms, declaring that all Gods on Olympus are against Kratos in defense of Zeus in order that Olympus will triumph. She stated that even if Kratos would like to take down Zeus, Zeus is Olympus. Kratos then promises to take revenge on Zeus and on any God who refuses to accept his revenge, claiming that their time has come to an end. Athena’s corpse is soon explodes when Gaia talks about Kratos in a way that reminds him of the power to alter the time itself.

Kratos comes back to the Loom and the room he’s within collapses around him. He returns once again into his time in the Great War of the Gods and Titans. He calls Gaia who announces the Titans were waiting for him, and Kratos states that they could beat at the Great War in his time.

In the aftermath of a defeat, Zeus is urging his friends and fellow Gods to aid him in killing the now rebellious Kratos Each and every Titan that ever existed returns to Kratos the time of their most powerful form (Due to Kratos being able to go back to when all the Titan had been at their most powerful to provide Kratos the greatest chance of winning) Furious and angry, They climb Mount Olympus to kill Zeus and the Gods. They are led by Kratos. Kratos declares the god Zeus “Zeus! Your son has returned, I bring the destruction of Olympus!!! ” This is immediately triggering the sequence of events that will take place in God of War III.

Characters

  • Kratos Kratos primary protagonist of the game. The game begins with God of War II, Kratos is the God of War after defeating Ares but being unable to be released from his suffering caused his grief to turn into anger and hatred for the gods. He joins his own mortal troops of Sparta to take on cities across Greece and causes the fury of Zeus as well as the other gods. Then, he realizes his trust shattered by Zeus and reduced to mortal, and his abilities are taken from him. Kratos is then required to go into his Sisters of Fate to exact revenge, restore his godly power and eliminate Zeus one and for all.
  • Athena is the goddess of wisdomand defense industry and war and the deuteragonist. While she is a constant participant in the game’s first, Athena is only seen three times to inform Kratos that his actions are displeasing the gods and goddesses, she channels her energy through the form of a statue and also to help Zeus by getting out of the way of Kratos to strike him down.
  • Gaia Gaia of all the Titans and is linked to all things that are Earth and the universe. As with other Titans she was slain during the War of the Titans, and after observing Kratos his quest to exact revenge against Zeus she offers to lend her strength to Kratos’ cause. She assists Kratos on his journey, hoping that they will bring down Olympus. She also serves as the game’s narrator.
  • Last Spartan: Kratos first encounters with the Last Spartan when he climbs out of the Underworld before heading to Pegasus. Kratos advises his Last Spartan to return to Sparta and get the troops ready for the battle. Kratos then meets The Last Spartan before his battle with the Kraken and, without knowing it, fights him. As the battle gets underway, Kratos doesn’t realize this is his personal Spartan lieutenant due to the darkness of the room. The battle is noteworthy because it is presented as a two-dimensional game. Kratos is defeated with a throw of the Spartan into the glass to the ground, and there Kratos discovers the identity of a severely wounded warrior. The Spartan who is the last Spartan is the one who informs Kratos his story of how Zeus defeated Sparta in Kratos absence and that the latter was on a mission to find the Sisters of Fate to change the fate of Sparta.
  • Lahkesis the middle (matron) one of three Sisters of Fate is adorned with a feathered dress and wings, as well as an axe. She ridicules Kratos by declaring that she is the one to decide that the Titans would not be defeated. Titans during the Great War and letting Kratos get to the Sisters. She is unable to accept Kratos and warns him that he’ll fall in his efforts to change his destiny.
  • Atropos Atropos: the most senior (crone) sister of Fate who was in Lakhesis until she broke off in order to take on Kratos. She ridiculed Kratos in his attempt to change his fate and demonstrated her ability to alter the events from the beginning of the God of War and attempting to take down her Blade of the Gods so that Kratos was killed in Ares the hand of Ares. Kratos must fight his own battles (with one of the battles from the first game on in the background) to fight her and save his life.
  • Clotho Clotho: The most junior (maiden) Sisters of Fate that Kratos encounters, even though she is not akin with her siblings. She is a hefty silkworm-like creature, with many arms and breasts, who is in an incredibly Multi-Leveled Loom Chamber. She is the loom that spins the thread of all mortals, gods and titan. Kratos must take on Clotho and master how to use the loom to defeat Zeus and alter his destiny.
  • Zeus Zeus: the Zeus is the King of Olympus and the gods that invented The Blade of Olympus and was the primary antagonist in the game. The godfather of Ares, Athena and Kratos. He is the one who betrays Kratos at the beginning in the game 2.

TROUBLESHOOTING God Of War II Fitgirl Repack Download

Also Read:

The Co-insurance Clause

The Co-insurance Clause
The Co-insurance Clause

Of the more important clauses in current use, the one most frequently used, most severely criticized, most mis¬ understood, most legislated against, and withal the most reasonable and most equitable, is that which in general terms is known as the “co-insurance clause.”
Insurance is one of the great necessities of our business, social and economic life, and the expense of maintaining it should be distributed among the property owners of the country as equitably as it is humanly possible so to do.
Losses and expenses are paid out of premiums col¬ lected. When a loss is total the penalty for underinsurance falls where it properly belongs, on the insured who has elected to save premium and assume a portion of the risk himself, and the same penalty for underinsurance should by contract be made to apply in case of partial loss as applies automatically in case of total loss.
If all losses were total, liberality on the part of the insured in the payment of premium would bring its own reward, and parsimony would bring its own penalty; but the records of the leading companies show that of all the losses sustained, about 65%—numerically—are less than $100; about 30% are between $100 and total; and about 5% are total. The natural inclination, therefore, on the part of the public, particularly on the less hazardous risks, is to under¬ insure and take the chance of not having a total loss; and this will generally be done except under special conditions, or when reasonably full insurance must be carried to sustain credit or as collateral security for loans. There were several strik¬ ing illustrations of this in the San Francisco conflagration, where the amount of insurance carried on so-called fireproof buildings was less than 10% of their value, and the insured in such instances, of course, paid a heavy penalty for their neglect to carry adequate insurance.
Co-insurance operates only in case of partial loss, where both the insurance carried and the loss sustained are less than the prescribed percentage named in the clause, and has the effect of preventing one who has insured for a small percentage of value and paid a correspondingly small pre¬ mium from collecting as much in the event of loss as one who has insured for a large percentage of value and paid a correspondingly large premium. We have high authority for the principle,
“He which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly, and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully.”
and it should be applied to contracts of insurance. Rating systems may come, and rating systems may go; but, unless the principle of co-insurance be recognized and universally applied, there can be no equitable division of the insurance burden, and the existing inequalities will go on forever. The principle is so well established in some countries that the general foreign form of policy issued by the London offices for use therein contains the full co-insurance clause in the printed conditions.
The necessity for co-insurance as an equalizer of rates was quite forcibly illustrated by a prominent underwriter in an ad¬ dress delivered several years ago, in the following example involving two buildings of superior construction:
“A’S” BUILDING “B’S” BUILDING
Value $100,000 Value $100,000
Insurance 80,000 Insurance 10,000
Rate 1% Rate 1%
Premium received— Premium received—
one year, 800 one year, 100
No Co-insurance Clause No Co-insurance Clause
Loss 800 Loss 800
Loss Collectible 800 Loss Collectible 800
“B” pays only one-eighth as much premium as “A,” yet both collect the same amount of loss, and in the absence of co-insurance conditions both would collect the same amount in all instances where the loss is $10,000 or less. Of course, if the loss should exceed $10,000, “A” would reap his reward, and “B” would pay his penalty. This situation clearly calls either for a difference in rate in favor of “A” or for a difference in loss collection as against “B,” and the latter can be regulated only through the medium of a co-insurance condition in the policy.
At this point it may not be amiss incidentally to inquire why the owner of a building which is heavily encumbered, whose policies are payable to a mortgagee (particularly a junior encumbrancer) under a mortgagee clause, and where subrogation may be of little or no value, should have the benefit of the same rate as the owner of another building of similar construction with similar occupancy, but unencum¬ bered.
In some states rates are made with and without co- insurance conditions, quite a material reduction in the basis rate being allowed for the insertion of the 80% clause in the policy, and a further reduction for the use of the 90% and 100% clauses. This, however, does not go far enough, and any variation in rate should be graded according to the co-insurance percentage named in the clause, and this gradation should not be restricted, as it is, to 80%, 90% or 100%, if the principle of equalization is to be maintained.
Various clauses designed to give practical effect to the co-insurance principle have been in use in this country for nearly forty years in connection with fire and other contracts of insurance. Some of these are well adapted to the purpose intended, while others fail to accomplish said purpose under certain conditions; but, fortunately, incidents of this nature are not of frequent occurrence.
There are, generally speaking, four forms, which differ quite materially in phraseology, and sometimes differ in prac¬ tical application. These four clauses are: (1) the old co- insurance clause; (2) the percentage co-insurance clause; (3) the average clause; (4) the reduced rate contribution clause.
Until recently, underwriters were complacently using some of these titles indiscriminately in certain portions of the country, under the assumption that the clauses, although differently phrased, were in effect the same, but they were subjected to quite a rude awakening by a decision which was handed down about a year ago by the Tennessee Court of Civic Appeals. The law in Tennessee permits the use of the three-fourths value clause and the co-insurance clause, but permits no other restrictive provisions. The form in use bore the inscription “Co-insurance Clause,” but the context was the phraseology of the reduced rate contribution clause, and although the result was the same under the operation of either, the court held that the form used was not the co- insurance clause, hence it was void and consequently inop¬ erative. Thompson vs. Concordia Fire Ins. Co. (Tenn. 1919) 215 S.W. Rep. 932, 55 Ins. Law Journal 122.
The law of Georgia provides that all insurance companies shall pay the full amount of loss sustained up to the amount of insurance expressed in the policy, and that all stipulations in such policies to the contrary shall be null and void. The law further provides that when the insured has several policies on the same property, his recovery from any company will be pro rata as to the amount thereof.
About twenty years ago, the Supreipe Court of Georgia was called upon to decide whether under the law referred to the old co-insurance clause then in use, which provided
“that the assured shall at all times maintain a total insurance upon the property insured by this policy of not less than 75% of the actual cash value thereof . . . . and that failing to do so, the assured shall
become a co-insurer to the extent of the deficiency,”
was valid and enforceable, and it decided that the clause was not violative of the law. Pekor vs. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. (1898) (106 Ga. page 1)

The Co-insurance Clause
The Co-insurance Clause
The court evidently construed the clause as a binding agreement on the part of the insured to secure insurance up to a certain percentage of value, and virtually held that if the insured himself desired to take the place of another insurance company he was at liberty to do so as one way of fulfilling his agreement.

The Georgia courts, however, have not passed upon the validity of the reduced rate contribution clause in connection with the statutory law above referred to; but it is fair to assume that they will view the matter in the same light as the Tennessee court (supra), and hold that it is not a co-insurance clause, even though it generally produces the same result; that it contains no provision whatever requiring the insured to carry or procure a stated amount of insurance, and in event of failure, to become a co-insurer, but that it is simply a clause placing a limitation upon the insurer’s liability, which is expressly prohibited by statute. The fact that the insurers have labeled it “75% Co-insurance Clause” does not make it such.
It is, therefore, not at all surprising that the question is frequently asked as to the difference between the various forms of so-called co-insurance clauses, and these will be considered in the order in which, chronologically, they came into use.
Probably in ninety-nine cases out of one hundred there is no difference* between these clauses in the results obtained by their application, but cases occasionally arise where ac¬ cording to the generally accepted interpretation the difference will be quite pronounced. This difference, which will be hereinafter considered, appears in connecton with the old co-insurance clause and the percentage co-insurance clause, and only in cases where the policies are nonconcurrent.
The first of the four forms is the old co-insurance clause which for many years was the only one used in the West, and which is used there still, to some extent, and now quite generally in the South. Its reintroduction in the South was probably due to the Tennessee decision, to which reference has been made (supra). This clause provides that the insured shall maintain insurance on the property described in the policy to the extent of at least a stated percentage (usually 80%) of the actual cash value thereof, and failing so to do, shall to the extent of such deficit bear his, her or their pro¬ portion of any loss. It does not say that he shall maintain insurance on all of the property, and the prevailing opinion is that the co-insurance clause will be complied with if he carries the stipulated percentage of insurance either on all or on any part of the property described, notwithstanding the fact that a portion of said insurance may be of no assist¬ ance whatever to the blanket, or more general policy, as a contributing factor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.